Future publics : long-term thinking and farsighted action in democratic systems
Many scholars have argued that democracies cannot effectively address long-term problems because of the political dynamics of short electoral cycles, the immediate concerns of voters, the influence of powerful actors with dominant short-term interests, or the political impotence of future persons wh...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of British Columbia
2013
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/45169 |
id |
ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-45169 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-451692014-03-26T03:39:51Z Future publics : long-term thinking and farsighted action in democratic systems MacKenzie, Michael Kenneth Many scholars have argued that democracies cannot effectively address long-term problems because of the political dynamics of short electoral cycles, the immediate concerns of voters, the influence of powerful actors with dominant short-term interests, or the political impotence of future persons who do not yet exist. This dissertation explores and challenges these claims. I argue that democracy — in both theory and practice — can help encourage longer-term thinking and make collectively intentional farsighted actions possible. Much of what we know about the nature of intertemporal relations comes from theories of intergenerational justice. A justice-based approach is intuitively appealing because claims of justice are typically granted priority over claims of other types. Unlike political agreements, principles of justice cannot be legitimately ignored or abandoned in response to changing preferences or partisan motives. Nevertheless, I argue that we need to think not only about our justice-based obligations to the future but also about how the actions of individuals and groups can be coordinated such that collectively-desirable long-term objectives can be identified, specified, and achieved. Democracy is not just a system for registering existing views and preferences; it is also a means of shaping preferences and changing the expectations of individuals and groups. I argue that multilayered democratic systems that are comprised of both electoral and extra-electoral institutions, can help mitigate many of the problems identified by those who have argued that democracies are, by nature, short-sighted. At the large scale, democratic practices such as public deliberation make it possible for a society to talk to itself about what it is doing and where it wants to go. At the small scale, deliberation can help encourage longer-term thinking by creating conditions that favour other-regarding positions, including those that take into consideration the potential interests of future-others. Under certain conditions, democracies can create political imperatives that reward long-term thinking and turn short-term positions into political liabilities. While there are features of democratic systems that create and nurture short-term imperatives, democracies are not without resources for overcoming these challenges. 2013-10-01T14:34:58Z 2013-10-01T14:34:58Z 2013 2013-10-01 2013-11 Electronic Thesis or Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/45169 eng University of British Columbia |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
Many scholars have argued that democracies cannot effectively address long-term problems because of the political dynamics of short electoral cycles, the immediate concerns of voters, the influence of powerful actors with dominant short-term interests, or the political impotence of future persons who do not yet exist. This dissertation explores and challenges these claims. I argue that democracy — in both theory and practice — can help encourage longer-term thinking and make collectively intentional farsighted actions possible. Much of what we know about the nature of intertemporal relations comes from theories of intergenerational justice. A justice-based approach is intuitively appealing because claims of justice are typically granted priority over claims of other types. Unlike political agreements, principles of justice cannot be legitimately ignored or abandoned in response to changing preferences or partisan motives. Nevertheless, I argue that we need to think not only about our justice-based obligations to the future but also about how the actions of individuals and groups can be coordinated such that collectively-desirable long-term objectives can be identified, specified, and achieved. Democracy is not just a system for registering existing views and preferences; it is also a means of shaping preferences and changing the expectations of individuals and groups. I argue that multilayered democratic systems that are comprised of both electoral and extra-electoral institutions, can help mitigate many of the problems identified by those who have argued that democracies are, by nature, short-sighted. At the large scale, democratic practices such as public deliberation make it possible for a society to talk to itself about what it is doing and where it wants to go. At the small scale, deliberation can help encourage longer-term thinking by creating conditions that favour other-regarding positions, including those that take into consideration the potential interests of future-others. Under certain conditions, democracies can create political imperatives that reward long-term thinking and turn short-term positions into political liabilities. While there are features of democratic systems that create and nurture short-term imperatives, democracies are not without resources for overcoming these challenges. |
author |
MacKenzie, Michael Kenneth |
spellingShingle |
MacKenzie, Michael Kenneth Future publics : long-term thinking and farsighted action in democratic systems |
author_facet |
MacKenzie, Michael Kenneth |
author_sort |
MacKenzie, Michael Kenneth |
title |
Future publics : long-term thinking and farsighted action in democratic systems |
title_short |
Future publics : long-term thinking and farsighted action in democratic systems |
title_full |
Future publics : long-term thinking and farsighted action in democratic systems |
title_fullStr |
Future publics : long-term thinking and farsighted action in democratic systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Future publics : long-term thinking and farsighted action in democratic systems |
title_sort |
future publics : long-term thinking and farsighted action in democratic systems |
publisher |
University of British Columbia |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2429/45169 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mackenziemichaelkenneth futurepublicslongtermthinkingandfarsightedactionindemocraticsystems |
_version_ |
1716656880737058816 |