Adversus paganos : disaster, dragons, and episcopal authority in Gregory of Tours

It is commonly assumed that, in the early Middle Ages, those phenomena which modern readers might recognize as “natural disasters” were instead interpreted as divine punishments resulting from human sin. The appropriate response to such phenomena thus involved individual and collective penance. This...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Patterson, David J.
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/44913
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-44913
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-449132014-03-26T03:39:50Z Adversus paganos : disaster, dragons, and episcopal authority in Gregory of Tours Patterson, David J. It is commonly assumed that, in the early Middle Ages, those phenomena which modern readers might recognize as “natural disasters” were instead interpreted as divine punishments resulting from human sin. The appropriate response to such phenomena thus involved individual and collective penance. This thesis investigates one particularly inscrutable account of a “natural disaster” recorded by Gregory of Tours in Book 10 of his Histories: a catastrophic flood of the Tiber River that was followed by an outbreak of pestilence at Rome. The flooding was accompanied by striking "signa" and ominous portents: the corpse of a dragon was washed downstream together with several serpents. The calamity not only destroyed church property but also claimed the life of Pope Pelagius II. I conclude that Gregory’s description of these events indeed confirms the notion that calamities readily construed by modern readers as natural disasters were seen in the late sixth century as divinely ordained punishments. Yet Gregory’s interpretation of the disasters befalling Rome is also quite complex; the dragon and serpents, I conclude, represent the pagan god Asclepius, and thus form part of a complex interpretive framework drawing upon pagan historiography and the works of Christian apologists. Through this interpretive framework, Gregory sought to reveal the immediate causes of Rome’s divine punishment, the logic behind Pelagius’ death, and the appropriate or ideal role of “the good bishop” or “good shepherd”—represented in this instance by Gregory the Great—in providing succor and ameliorating the effects of a punishment wrought by God. 2013-08-27T17:58:36Z 2013-08-27T17:58:36Z 2013 2013-08-27 2013-11 Electronic Thesis or Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/44913 eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/ Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description It is commonly assumed that, in the early Middle Ages, those phenomena which modern readers might recognize as “natural disasters” were instead interpreted as divine punishments resulting from human sin. The appropriate response to such phenomena thus involved individual and collective penance. This thesis investigates one particularly inscrutable account of a “natural disaster” recorded by Gregory of Tours in Book 10 of his Histories: a catastrophic flood of the Tiber River that was followed by an outbreak of pestilence at Rome. The flooding was accompanied by striking "signa" and ominous portents: the corpse of a dragon was washed downstream together with several serpents. The calamity not only destroyed church property but also claimed the life of Pope Pelagius II. I conclude that Gregory’s description of these events indeed confirms the notion that calamities readily construed by modern readers as natural disasters were seen in the late sixth century as divinely ordained punishments. Yet Gregory’s interpretation of the disasters befalling Rome is also quite complex; the dragon and serpents, I conclude, represent the pagan god Asclepius, and thus form part of a complex interpretive framework drawing upon pagan historiography and the works of Christian apologists. Through this interpretive framework, Gregory sought to reveal the immediate causes of Rome’s divine punishment, the logic behind Pelagius’ death, and the appropriate or ideal role of “the good bishop” or “good shepherd”—represented in this instance by Gregory the Great—in providing succor and ameliorating the effects of a punishment wrought by God.
author Patterson, David J.
spellingShingle Patterson, David J.
Adversus paganos : disaster, dragons, and episcopal authority in Gregory of Tours
author_facet Patterson, David J.
author_sort Patterson, David J.
title Adversus paganos : disaster, dragons, and episcopal authority in Gregory of Tours
title_short Adversus paganos : disaster, dragons, and episcopal authority in Gregory of Tours
title_full Adversus paganos : disaster, dragons, and episcopal authority in Gregory of Tours
title_fullStr Adversus paganos : disaster, dragons, and episcopal authority in Gregory of Tours
title_full_unstemmed Adversus paganos : disaster, dragons, and episcopal authority in Gregory of Tours
title_sort adversus paganos : disaster, dragons, and episcopal authority in gregory of tours
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/44913
work_keys_str_mv AT pattersondavidj adversuspaganosdisasterdragonsandepiscopalauthorityingregoryoftours
_version_ 1716656827840593920