All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states
Despite efforts to reduce logging rates, deforestation due to illegal timber harvests continues to plague REDD+ countries. This problem occurs in an array of states that exhibit variance regarding quality of governance, commitment to REDD+ projects, as well as history and causes of deforestation. Th...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of British Columbia
2013
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/44895 |
id |
ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-44895 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-448952014-03-26T03:39:50Z All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states Gochberg, William Despite efforts to reduce logging rates, deforestation due to illegal timber harvests continues to plague REDD+ countries. This problem occurs in an array of states that exhibit variance regarding quality of governance, commitment to REDD+ projects, as well as history and causes of deforestation. This behavior is best explained as a typical challenge of implementing policy for nations in which the ‘weak’ state is merely one of several actors wielding power in the form of social control. These power dynamics are likely to persist, or change only at a rate that puts successful implementation of REDD+ projects in jeopardy. Extending this framework to the international level demonstrates how the design of international regimes such as REDD+ may work either to exacerbate or to moderate existing conflict among actors with social power, and how contestation at the local level may act to influence the politics of these global regimes. 2013-08-27T17:19:42Z 2013-08-27T17:19:42Z 2013 2013-08-27 2013-11 Electronic Thesis or Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/44895 eng http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ CC0 1.0 Universal University of British Columbia |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
Despite efforts to reduce logging rates, deforestation due to illegal timber harvests continues to plague REDD+ countries. This problem occurs in an array of states that exhibit variance regarding quality of governance, commitment to REDD+ projects, as well as history and causes of deforestation. This behavior is best explained as a typical challenge of implementing policy for nations in which the ‘weak’ state is merely one of several actors wielding power in the form of social control. These power dynamics are likely to persist, or change only at a rate that puts successful implementation of REDD+ projects in jeopardy. Extending this framework to the international level demonstrates how the design of international regimes such as REDD+ may work either to exacerbate or to moderate existing conflict among actors with social power, and how contestation at the local level may act to influence the politics of these global regimes. |
author |
Gochberg, William |
spellingShingle |
Gochberg, William All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states |
author_facet |
Gochberg, William |
author_sort |
Gochberg, William |
title |
All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states |
title_short |
All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states |
title_full |
All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states |
title_fullStr |
All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states |
title_full_unstemmed |
All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states |
title_sort |
all bark and no bite? : illegal logging and redd implementation in weak states |
publisher |
University of British Columbia |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2429/44895 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gochbergwilliam allbarkandnobiteillegalloggingandreddimplementationinweakstates |
_version_ |
1716656822368075776 |