All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states

Despite efforts to reduce logging rates, deforestation due to illegal timber harvests continues to plague REDD+ countries. This problem occurs in an array of states that exhibit variance regarding quality of governance, commitment to REDD+ projects, as well as history and causes of deforestation. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gochberg, William
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/44895
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-44895
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-448952014-03-26T03:39:50Z All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states Gochberg, William Despite efforts to reduce logging rates, deforestation due to illegal timber harvests continues to plague REDD+ countries. This problem occurs in an array of states that exhibit variance regarding quality of governance, commitment to REDD+ projects, as well as history and causes of deforestation. This behavior is best explained as a typical challenge of implementing policy for nations in which the ‘weak’ state is merely one of several actors wielding power in the form of social control. These power dynamics are likely to persist, or change only at a rate that puts successful implementation of REDD+ projects in jeopardy. Extending this framework to the international level demonstrates how the design of international regimes such as REDD+ may work either to exacerbate or to moderate existing conflict among actors with social power, and how contestation at the local level may act to influence the politics of these global regimes. 2013-08-27T17:19:42Z 2013-08-27T17:19:42Z 2013 2013-08-27 2013-11 Electronic Thesis or Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/44895 eng http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ CC0 1.0 Universal University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description Despite efforts to reduce logging rates, deforestation due to illegal timber harvests continues to plague REDD+ countries. This problem occurs in an array of states that exhibit variance regarding quality of governance, commitment to REDD+ projects, as well as history and causes of deforestation. This behavior is best explained as a typical challenge of implementing policy for nations in which the ‘weak’ state is merely one of several actors wielding power in the form of social control. These power dynamics are likely to persist, or change only at a rate that puts successful implementation of REDD+ projects in jeopardy. Extending this framework to the international level demonstrates how the design of international regimes such as REDD+ may work either to exacerbate or to moderate existing conflict among actors with social power, and how contestation at the local level may act to influence the politics of these global regimes.
author Gochberg, William
spellingShingle Gochberg, William
All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states
author_facet Gochberg, William
author_sort Gochberg, William
title All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states
title_short All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states
title_full All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states
title_fullStr All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states
title_full_unstemmed All bark and no bite? : illegal logging and REDD implementation in weak states
title_sort all bark and no bite? : illegal logging and redd implementation in weak states
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/44895
work_keys_str_mv AT gochbergwilliam allbarkandnobiteillegalloggingandreddimplementationinweakstates
_version_ 1716656822368075776