| Summary: | Contemporary prison systems are faced with such overwhelming problems that they are
argued to be in a crisis. Privatization of prisons is offered as the solution for the troubled penal
system, both by private companies greedy to move in on this new expanding market, and by
conservative governments eager to show they are "dealing" with crime but yet cutting costs.
It is argued that by contracting out corrections to private firms, the quality of imprisonment
can be improved, while money can be saved. This thesis explores whether privatization of
prisons is the solution it is argued to be for the current penal crisis.
To establish whether privatization is a solution for the penal crisis it is important to
define this alleged penal crisis. In this thesis I demonstrate that the term penal crisis is not
sufficient as it suggests that all that is needed is a quick emergency solution. Privatization is
offered as such a solution, but it does not deal with the high imprisonment rates and the overrepresentation
of minorities in the prison system. It does not deal with the nature and
inefficiency of imprisonment itself or with any of the systematic problems of the criminal
justice system such as discrimination and the definition of what constitutes crime. Privatization
also does not deal with any of the underlying causes of crime in society, such as inequality,
poverty, unemployment and problems resulting from colonialism.
It is impossible to view privatization separately from these bigger issues in penality.
Thus, my conclusion is that the problems in the prison system are so systematic and deep, and
so engrained in the structure of society that privatization is not going to solve them.
|
|---|
