Collaborative cultures in public schools : A review and analysis

Discussions within the literature on education have presented conflicting definitions of the term collaborative cultures. Nonetheless, a general sanctioning of teacher collaboration has predominated. With the intent of evaluating that advocacy and developing a better understanding of the notion i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Montgomery, Andrew David
Language:English
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/3548
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-3548
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-35482014-03-14T15:39:00Z Collaborative cultures in public schools : A review and analysis Montgomery, Andrew David Discussions within the literature on education have presented conflicting definitions of the term collaborative cultures. Nonetheless, a general sanctioning of teacher collaboration has predominated. With the intent of evaluating that advocacy and developing a better understanding of the notion itself (collaboration), this study examines collaborative relationships in public schools. Specifically, an analysis of the literature has been undertaken to comprehend more fully collaborative associations between teachers, and teachers and administrators. The many conceptual notions of collegiality and collaboration were considered when choosing a method of analysis, and an attempt was made to identify recurrent themes within the literature. The following were felt to be most prominent: cultural requirements of collegiality, structural requirements of collegiality, curriculum development and evaluation, instructional innovation, and conceptual models of teaching. The frequency with which researchers have discussed collaborative teaching prompted a number of queries, including those concerning teacher development. This study set out to answer the following questions: 1. What behaviours define collaboration? 2. How do conceptions of collaboration found in the literature compare? 3. Is collaboration a behavioural goal (end) or a means to some other purpose(s), or, is it an indicator of the effectiveness of personnel practices? 4. Is collaboration a meaningless slogan, or, behaviour worth dedicating sparse educational resources towards? The findings include those that indicate the term collaborative cultures is often employed as a catch phrase. However, they also show that teacher collaboration holds significant promise for educational practice. As well, collaboration may be a frequently ignored but valuable tool for educational reform. 2009-01-11 2009-01-11 1995 2009-01-11 1995-05 Electronic Thesis or Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/3548 eng UBC Retrospective Theses Digitization Project [http://www.library.ubc.ca/archives/retro_theses/]
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description Discussions within the literature on education have presented conflicting definitions of the term collaborative cultures. Nonetheless, a general sanctioning of teacher collaboration has predominated. With the intent of evaluating that advocacy and developing a better understanding of the notion itself (collaboration), this study examines collaborative relationships in public schools. Specifically, an analysis of the literature has been undertaken to comprehend more fully collaborative associations between teachers, and teachers and administrators. The many conceptual notions of collegiality and collaboration were considered when choosing a method of analysis, and an attempt was made to identify recurrent themes within the literature. The following were felt to be most prominent: cultural requirements of collegiality, structural requirements of collegiality, curriculum development and evaluation, instructional innovation, and conceptual models of teaching. The frequency with which researchers have discussed collaborative teaching prompted a number of queries, including those concerning teacher development. This study set out to answer the following questions: 1. What behaviours define collaboration? 2. How do conceptions of collaboration found in the literature compare? 3. Is collaboration a behavioural goal (end) or a means to some other purpose(s), or, is it an indicator of the effectiveness of personnel practices? 4. Is collaboration a meaningless slogan, or, behaviour worth dedicating sparse educational resources towards? The findings include those that indicate the term collaborative cultures is often employed as a catch phrase. However, they also show that teacher collaboration holds significant promise for educational practice. As well, collaboration may be a frequently ignored but valuable tool for educational reform.
author Montgomery, Andrew David
spellingShingle Montgomery, Andrew David
Collaborative cultures in public schools : A review and analysis
author_facet Montgomery, Andrew David
author_sort Montgomery, Andrew David
title Collaborative cultures in public schools : A review and analysis
title_short Collaborative cultures in public schools : A review and analysis
title_full Collaborative cultures in public schools : A review and analysis
title_fullStr Collaborative cultures in public schools : A review and analysis
title_full_unstemmed Collaborative cultures in public schools : A review and analysis
title_sort collaborative cultures in public schools : a review and analysis
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/3548
work_keys_str_mv AT montgomeryandrewdavid collaborativeculturesinpublicschoolsareviewandanalysis
_version_ 1716650113962606592