| Summary: | Based on the premise that modernity’s understanding of the linguistic sign has a long
history dating back to ancient Greece when the linguistic mediation of knowledge preoccupied
thinkers like Parmenides and Plato, this dissertation synthesizes contemporary post-structuralist
and rhetorical understandings of language with like-minded findings of other fields of language
study. It sees post-structuralist and deconstructive understandings of language as being
congruent with the long tradition of rhetorical theory and the infamous linguistic turn in
philosophy, that was initiated by the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, as a turn away from the
actual phenomena of language towards an idealization of it. Nevertheless the thesis discovers
recent findings by some of the beneficiaries of the “philosophy of language” that corroborate
rhetorical theory’s insights.
Inspired by both Derrida and Plato, this dissertation presents a rhetorical-deconstructive
image of language that, recalling the root of the term skopevw (‘I look,’ ‘behold,’
‘contemplate’), I characterize as sceptical. This study follows the theoretical matrix of de Man,
Fish, Culler and Barbara Johnson, who are, of course, themselves following Derrida. It has a
holistic attitude to language characteristic of the Bakhtin/Volsohinov approach, drawing insights
from classical and contemporary rhetorical theory, post-structuralist theory, findings of systemic
functional grammar, recent work in cognitive science and psychology on affect and language
use, the scholarship of reported speech, and the ostensive-inferential theory of communication
called Relevance. This cross border work in intellectual history, language theory and stylistics
examines the interstices of theory and style in the work of figures such as Plato, Aristotle,
Bacon, Nietzsche, Wittgenstein, Voloshinov, Bakhtin and Derrida. Sperber and Wilson,
Scholars of Reported Speech and Halliday are central to its findings; the thinking of William
James and Silvan Tomkins play supporting roles. It positions Plato as the founder of rhetorical
theory and studies the voices of Plato and Derrida as language theorists. I examine both how
Plato and Derrida talk about language and what theories of language underlie their styles,
determining finally that their sceptical-rhetorical theories prompt their ironic-conversational
stylistics.
|
|---|
