The relationship between subjective age identity and personality variables across the adult lifespan

ABSTRACT The relationship between subjective age identity and ideal age, as measured by the Subjective Age Identity Scale (Hubley, 2004), and personality domains and facets, as measured by the NEO-PI-R (Costa & McCrae, 1992), was investigated in a sample of 210 adults ages 19 to 78. Subjective...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Launeanu, Mihaela Sorana
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/2401
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-2401
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.2429-24012014-03-26T03:35:21Z The relationship between subjective age identity and personality variables across the adult lifespan Launeanu, Mihaela Sorana Age identity Personality Adults ABSTRACT The relationship between subjective age identity and ideal age, as measured by the Subjective Age Identity Scale (Hubley, 2004), and personality domains and facets, as measured by the NEO-PI-R (Costa & McCrae, 1992), was investigated in a sample of 210 adults ages 19 to 78. Subjective age and ideal age scores were regressed, using multiple standard regressions, on the NEO-PI-R domains and facets, respectively. Results indicated that 22% of the variance in subjective age identity scores was explained by personality domains whereas 27% was explained by personality facets. Specifically, two personality domains (Openness to Experience and Neuroticism) and one personality facet (Aesthetics) made significant unique contributions to the explained variance in subjective age scores. Very little variance in ideal age scores was explained by personality domains and facets (less than 10%). One domain (Openness to Experience) and two facets (Vulnerability to Stress and Values) made significant unique contributions to the explained variance in the ideal age scores. These findings are examined in the context of the previous research on the relationship between personality and subjective age and the importance of conducting both domain and facet level analyses when using the NEO-PI-R is discussed. Implications of the present findings for counselling and clinical work with persons facing age role transitions or other age related concerns (e.g., negative attitudes towards aging) are highlighted. 2008-09-30T14:25:59Z 2008-09-30T14:25:59Z 2008 2008-09-30T14:25:59Z 2008-11 Electronic Thesis or Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2429/2401 eng University of British Columbia
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
topic Age identity
Personality
Adults
spellingShingle Age identity
Personality
Adults
Launeanu, Mihaela Sorana
The relationship between subjective age identity and personality variables across the adult lifespan
description ABSTRACT The relationship between subjective age identity and ideal age, as measured by the Subjective Age Identity Scale (Hubley, 2004), and personality domains and facets, as measured by the NEO-PI-R (Costa & McCrae, 1992), was investigated in a sample of 210 adults ages 19 to 78. Subjective age and ideal age scores were regressed, using multiple standard regressions, on the NEO-PI-R domains and facets, respectively. Results indicated that 22% of the variance in subjective age identity scores was explained by personality domains whereas 27% was explained by personality facets. Specifically, two personality domains (Openness to Experience and Neuroticism) and one personality facet (Aesthetics) made significant unique contributions to the explained variance in subjective age scores. Very little variance in ideal age scores was explained by personality domains and facets (less than 10%). One domain (Openness to Experience) and two facets (Vulnerability to Stress and Values) made significant unique contributions to the explained variance in the ideal age scores. These findings are examined in the context of the previous research on the relationship between personality and subjective age and the importance of conducting both domain and facet level analyses when using the NEO-PI-R is discussed. Implications of the present findings for counselling and clinical work with persons facing age role transitions or other age related concerns (e.g., negative attitudes towards aging) are highlighted.
author Launeanu, Mihaela Sorana
author_facet Launeanu, Mihaela Sorana
author_sort Launeanu, Mihaela Sorana
title The relationship between subjective age identity and personality variables across the adult lifespan
title_short The relationship between subjective age identity and personality variables across the adult lifespan
title_full The relationship between subjective age identity and personality variables across the adult lifespan
title_fullStr The relationship between subjective age identity and personality variables across the adult lifespan
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between subjective age identity and personality variables across the adult lifespan
title_sort relationship between subjective age identity and personality variables across the adult lifespan
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2008
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/2401
work_keys_str_mv AT launeanumihaelasorana therelationshipbetweensubjectiveageidentityandpersonalityvariablesacrosstheadultlifespan
AT launeanumihaelasorana relationshipbetweensubjectiveageidentityandpersonalityvariablesacrosstheadultlifespan
_version_ 1716654819962257408