Recycle dynamics and control in a simulated papermachine wet end

Over the years, increased competition and stricter environmental regulations have placed additional pressure on mills to become more efficient. Chemical additives are being used to enhance mill performance and improve paper quality. The use of recycle streams has also reduced the raw material cos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chong Ping, Michael
Language:English
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/14947
Description
Summary:Over the years, increased competition and stricter environmental regulations have placed additional pressure on mills to become more efficient. Chemical additives are being used to enhance mill performance and improve paper quality. The use of recycle streams has also reduced the raw material costs. These changes have made control of the wet end system a challenging problem for mill personnel. The presence of multiple recycle streams have exacerbated the problems in the wet end. To deal with these problems, the goal of this work is to provide an understanding of recycle dynamics and control that will help improve operations in the papermachine wet end. The first step was to examine recycle dynamics to identify responses that could be potential control problems. A simple recycle loop system composed of a process model in the forward path and a process model in the recycle path was used, and the study was performed using various combinations of parameter values for the process models. The recycle responses were found to fall broadly into three groups with groups two and three being identified as having responses that may cause problems for control. To determine if the wet end exhibited significant recycle behaviour, an IDEAS simulation model of the paper machine wet end was used. The study looked at the effect of a filler change in the recycle streams, and in the paper leaving the wire. The effect of tank sizes on the recycle dynamics was also explored. The process tanks resulted in all of the responses being first order. It was only when the tanks were removed from the process that recycle dynamics became apparent, but the extent of the dynamics depended on the number of recycle streams present. The problems in the wet end are also attributed to the effect of disturbances being returned to the process by the recycle streams. Two disturbance types were studied: (a) Quality disturbances, such as changes in temperature and stream composition, and (b) Flowrate disturbances which are basically flowrate variations. Quality disturbances require better control of the recycle process. The common PI controller was the first controller evaluated on the recycle process. The performance of the PI controller was adversely affected by the size of the time delays in the forward or recycle path. Little improvement in controller performance was obtained when dead-time compensation, in the form of a Smith Predictor, was used. A new approach using a seasonal model to represent the recycle process for model based control was presented. The seasonal model approach was compared to the following model based control solutions found in the literature: (a) the recycle compensator which removes the recycle effect and (b) the Taylor series approach which approximates the denominator dead time terms of the recycle process. The seasonal model approach provided comparable performance to the existing methods and was more practical. Flow disturbances are usually dampened by the surge tanks. However, the degree of disturbance attentuation is determined by tank level controller. If the controller is tuned for tight level control, the flow disturbance may pass from the input to the output with very little attenuation. When the controller is tuned for averaging level control, disturbances in the flowrate are significantly reduced. In this work, an optimal averaging level control algorithm developed by Foley et al. (2000) was selected. The algorithm is based on constrained minimum variance and guarantees the lowest possible flowrate variation. The algorithm was to handle the case of sampling delays greater than one. The algorithm was applied to a saveall simulation to reduce the flowrate variability from the saveall to the blend chest.