Two-step and joint likelihood methods for joint models

Survival data often arise in longitudinal studies, and the survival process and the longitudinal process may be related to each other. Thus, it is desirable to jointly model the survival process and the longitudinal process to avoid possible biased and inefficient inferences from separate inferences...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ye, Qian
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/43059
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.-43059
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.-430592013-06-05T04:20:38ZTwo-step and joint likelihood methods for joint modelsYe, QianSurvival data often arise in longitudinal studies, and the survival process and the longitudinal process may be related to each other. Thus, it is desirable to jointly model the survival process and the longitudinal process to avoid possible biased and inefficient inferences from separate inferences. We consider mixed effects models (LME, GLMM, and NLME models) for the longitudinal process, and Cox models and accelerated failure time (AFT) models for the survival process. The survival model and the longitudinal model are linked through shared parameters or unobserved variables. We consider joint likelihood method and two-step methods to make joint inference for the survival model and the longitudinal model. We have proposed linear approximation methods to joint models with GLMM and NLME submodels to reduce computation burden and use existing software. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performances of the joint likelihood method and two-step methods. It is concluded that the joint likelihood method outperforms the two-step methods.University of British Columbia2012-08-27T13:24:35Z2012-08-27T13:24:35Z20122012-08-272012-11Electronic Thesis or Dissertationhttp://hdl.handle.net/2429/43059eng
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description Survival data often arise in longitudinal studies, and the survival process and the longitudinal process may be related to each other. Thus, it is desirable to jointly model the survival process and the longitudinal process to avoid possible biased and inefficient inferences from separate inferences. We consider mixed effects models (LME, GLMM, and NLME models) for the longitudinal process, and Cox models and accelerated failure time (AFT) models for the survival process. The survival model and the longitudinal model are linked through shared parameters or unobserved variables. We consider joint likelihood method and two-step methods to make joint inference for the survival model and the longitudinal model. We have proposed linear approximation methods to joint models with GLMM and NLME submodels to reduce computation burden and use existing software. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performances of the joint likelihood method and two-step methods. It is concluded that the joint likelihood method outperforms the two-step methods.
author Ye, Qian
spellingShingle Ye, Qian
Two-step and joint likelihood methods for joint models
author_facet Ye, Qian
author_sort Ye, Qian
title Two-step and joint likelihood methods for joint models
title_short Two-step and joint likelihood methods for joint models
title_full Two-step and joint likelihood methods for joint models
title_fullStr Two-step and joint likelihood methods for joint models
title_full_unstemmed Two-step and joint likelihood methods for joint models
title_sort two-step and joint likelihood methods for joint models
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/43059
work_keys_str_mv AT yeqian twostepandjointlikelihoodmethodsforjointmodels
_version_ 1716588313232539648