Crossnational divergence in post-OPEC embargo energy policy : foreign policy capacity in Germany and the United States

This thesis explains the origins of the differing domestic energy policy regimes in the United States and Germany. Using historical process tracing, the author argues that policy diverged following the 1973-74 Energy embargo. This crisis allowed space for considerable policy innovation in the two na...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Barnum, Forrest Scott Lewis
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/40837
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.-40837
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.-408372013-06-05T04:20:13ZCrossnational divergence in post-OPEC embargo energy policy : foreign policy capacity in Germany and the United StatesBarnum, Forrest Scott LewisThis thesis explains the origins of the differing domestic energy policy regimes in the United States and Germany. Using historical process tracing, the author argues that policy diverged following the 1973-74 Energy embargo. This crisis allowed space for considerable policy innovation in the two nations, but Germany was able to carry out far more extensive domestic reforms. The author argues Germany had a much greater incentive to pursue these often costly policies thanks to its limited foreign policy capacities. This hypothesis is tested using a methodology derived from Alexander George and Andrew Bennett’s work on case studies and a theoretical model based on Terry Karl and Paul Pierson’s analysis of critical junctures and path dependence. The United States, by contrast, was able to execute a solution based on securing external supplies. The thesis concludes by exploring the implications for contemporary energy policy.University of British Columbia2012-02-22T21:35:34Z2012-02-22T21:35:34Z20122012-02-222012-05Electronic Thesis or Dissertationhttp://hdl.handle.net/2429/40837eng
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description This thesis explains the origins of the differing domestic energy policy regimes in the United States and Germany. Using historical process tracing, the author argues that policy diverged following the 1973-74 Energy embargo. This crisis allowed space for considerable policy innovation in the two nations, but Germany was able to carry out far more extensive domestic reforms. The author argues Germany had a much greater incentive to pursue these often costly policies thanks to its limited foreign policy capacities. This hypothesis is tested using a methodology derived from Alexander George and Andrew Bennett’s work on case studies and a theoretical model based on Terry Karl and Paul Pierson’s analysis of critical junctures and path dependence. The United States, by contrast, was able to execute a solution based on securing external supplies. The thesis concludes by exploring the implications for contemporary energy policy.
author Barnum, Forrest Scott Lewis
spellingShingle Barnum, Forrest Scott Lewis
Crossnational divergence in post-OPEC embargo energy policy : foreign policy capacity in Germany and the United States
author_facet Barnum, Forrest Scott Lewis
author_sort Barnum, Forrest Scott Lewis
title Crossnational divergence in post-OPEC embargo energy policy : foreign policy capacity in Germany and the United States
title_short Crossnational divergence in post-OPEC embargo energy policy : foreign policy capacity in Germany and the United States
title_full Crossnational divergence in post-OPEC embargo energy policy : foreign policy capacity in Germany and the United States
title_fullStr Crossnational divergence in post-OPEC embargo energy policy : foreign policy capacity in Germany and the United States
title_full_unstemmed Crossnational divergence in post-OPEC embargo energy policy : foreign policy capacity in Germany and the United States
title_sort crossnational divergence in post-opec embargo energy policy : foreign policy capacity in germany and the united states
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/40837
work_keys_str_mv AT barnumforrestscottlewis crossnationaldivergenceinpostopecembargoenergypolicyforeignpolicycapacityingermanyandtheunitedstates
_version_ 1716588086754803712