File-based autobiographies after 1989

This study analyzes four autobiographical accounts written after the fall of the Berlin Wall by former data subjects, i.e., by individuals who have been under the surveillance of the East German Stasi (Staatssicherheit). Following a suggestion by Cornelia Vismann, I refer to these texts as “file-bas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roy, Catherine Karen
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/38062
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.-38062
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.-380622013-06-05T04:19:50ZFile-based autobiographies after 1989Roy, Catherine KarenThis study analyzes four autobiographical accounts written after the fall of the Berlin Wall by former data subjects, i.e., by individuals who have been under the surveillance of the East German Stasi (Staatssicherheit). Following a suggestion by Cornelia Vismann, I refer to these texts as “file-based autobiographies.” The term reflects the fact that they were written in response to the opening of the Stasi archives and the passing of the Stasi Files Act, which allowed data subjects to access their files. By constructing narratives using files written and compiled by informers and secret police officials rather than relying on their own, personal memories, these data subjects challenge the traditional aesthetics of autobiographies and subvert the usual expectations of autobiographical reading. “File-based autobiographies" constitute nothing less than a new autobiographical sub-genre. Rather than offering a personal story that begins in early childhood and ends later in life, data subjects engage in a revision of their lives using files written by a hostile third party. The four case studies show how people under surveillance may need to draw on such documents, even if they are inaccurate, in order to support their claims of authenticity and thus fulfill the autobiographical pact. In this way, these autobiographers acquire and re-functionalize the hostile documents, thus challenging the original purposes for which the files were kept. They show that using their files not only results in unexpected memory processes, but is also a political and literary process that supports their personal agendas and targets particular audiences. Access to and subsequent use of their files gives them the authority to discuss their reaction to the opening of the Stasi files as well as the records themselves.University of British Columbia2011-10-19T15:14:06Z2011-10-19T15:14:06Z20112011-10-192011-11Electronic Thesis or Dissertationhttp://hdl.handle.net/2429/38062eng
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description This study analyzes four autobiographical accounts written after the fall of the Berlin Wall by former data subjects, i.e., by individuals who have been under the surveillance of the East German Stasi (Staatssicherheit). Following a suggestion by Cornelia Vismann, I refer to these texts as “file-based autobiographies.” The term reflects the fact that they were written in response to the opening of the Stasi archives and the passing of the Stasi Files Act, which allowed data subjects to access their files. By constructing narratives using files written and compiled by informers and secret police officials rather than relying on their own, personal memories, these data subjects challenge the traditional aesthetics of autobiographies and subvert the usual expectations of autobiographical reading. “File-based autobiographies" constitute nothing less than a new autobiographical sub-genre. Rather than offering a personal story that begins in early childhood and ends later in life, data subjects engage in a revision of their lives using files written by a hostile third party. The four case studies show how people under surveillance may need to draw on such documents, even if they are inaccurate, in order to support their claims of authenticity and thus fulfill the autobiographical pact. In this way, these autobiographers acquire and re-functionalize the hostile documents, thus challenging the original purposes for which the files were kept. They show that using their files not only results in unexpected memory processes, but is also a political and literary process that supports their personal agendas and targets particular audiences. Access to and subsequent use of their files gives them the authority to discuss their reaction to the opening of the Stasi files as well as the records themselves.
author Roy, Catherine Karen
spellingShingle Roy, Catherine Karen
File-based autobiographies after 1989
author_facet Roy, Catherine Karen
author_sort Roy, Catherine Karen
title File-based autobiographies after 1989
title_short File-based autobiographies after 1989
title_full File-based autobiographies after 1989
title_fullStr File-based autobiographies after 1989
title_full_unstemmed File-based autobiographies after 1989
title_sort file-based autobiographies after 1989
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/38062
work_keys_str_mv AT roycatherinekaren filebasedautobiographiesafter1989
_version_ 1716587978003841024