How instruction supportive of self-regulated learning might foster self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities during literacy tasks

While self-efficacy (SE) and self-regulated learning (SRL) are key processes that are related to successful literacy performance, these are two areas where students often struggle, particularly students with learning disabilities (LD). Fortunately, research has identified instructional features that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Scott, Jennifer
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/35970
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.-35970
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.-359702013-06-05T04:19:49ZHow instruction supportive of self-regulated learning might foster self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities during literacy tasksScott, JenniferWhile self-efficacy (SE) and self-regulated learning (SRL) are key processes that are related to successful literacy performance, these are two areas where students often struggle, particularly students with learning disabilities (LD). Fortunately, research has identified instructional features that can be embedded in classrooms to support SRL. This study built from that research to investigate whether those SRL-supportive instructional features might also support students’ SE while working on literacy tasks in different kinds of classroom placements (inclusive, support, or pull-out). An instrumental qualitative case study design was used to examine the SE of seven intermediate students at different achievement levels, including three students with learning disabilities. Results revealed: (a) similarities across teachers working in different kinds of placements in their use of SRL-supportive instructional features, with some features being implemented with greater frequency and consistency, (b) relationships between environmental conditions and SE, such as the provision of choices, but also (c) the ways in which SE perceptions were mediated by students' perceptions of environmental conditions. Overall, cross-case analyses highlighted the complex, dynamic, and situated nature of SE, and identified ways in which environmental and personal factors interacted in students’ SE attributions. In closing the thesis, these results are considered in the context of previous research, and theoretical, methodological, and practical limitations, contributions and implications are outlined.University of British Columbia2011-07-12T16:51:08Z2011-07-12T16:51:08Z20112011-07-122011-11Electronic Thesis or Dissertationhttp://hdl.handle.net/2429/35970eng
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description While self-efficacy (SE) and self-regulated learning (SRL) are key processes that are related to successful literacy performance, these are two areas where students often struggle, particularly students with learning disabilities (LD). Fortunately, research has identified instructional features that can be embedded in classrooms to support SRL. This study built from that research to investigate whether those SRL-supportive instructional features might also support students’ SE while working on literacy tasks in different kinds of classroom placements (inclusive, support, or pull-out). An instrumental qualitative case study design was used to examine the SE of seven intermediate students at different achievement levels, including three students with learning disabilities. Results revealed: (a) similarities across teachers working in different kinds of placements in their use of SRL-supportive instructional features, with some features being implemented with greater frequency and consistency, (b) relationships between environmental conditions and SE, such as the provision of choices, but also (c) the ways in which SE perceptions were mediated by students' perceptions of environmental conditions. Overall, cross-case analyses highlighted the complex, dynamic, and situated nature of SE, and identified ways in which environmental and personal factors interacted in students’ SE attributions. In closing the thesis, these results are considered in the context of previous research, and theoretical, methodological, and practical limitations, contributions and implications are outlined.
author Scott, Jennifer
spellingShingle Scott, Jennifer
How instruction supportive of self-regulated learning might foster self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities during literacy tasks
author_facet Scott, Jennifer
author_sort Scott, Jennifer
title How instruction supportive of self-regulated learning might foster self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities during literacy tasks
title_short How instruction supportive of self-regulated learning might foster self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities during literacy tasks
title_full How instruction supportive of self-regulated learning might foster self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities during literacy tasks
title_fullStr How instruction supportive of self-regulated learning might foster self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities during literacy tasks
title_full_unstemmed How instruction supportive of self-regulated learning might foster self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities during literacy tasks
title_sort how instruction supportive of self-regulated learning might foster self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities during literacy tasks
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/35970
work_keys_str_mv AT scottjennifer howinstructionsupportiveofselfregulatedlearningmightfosterselfefficacyforstudentswithandwithoutlearningdisabilitiesduringliteracytasks
_version_ 1716587852215615488