Phonological development in twins after non-linear phonological and morphosyntactic intervention

This study examined the phonological development of a set of 6-year-old male dizygotic twins with protracted phonological and morphosyntactic development. Each twin was given 16 weeks of therapy, 8 weeks of morphosyntactic treatment and 8 weeks of phonology treatment. These 8-week treatment blocks w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Feehan, Angela M
Language:English
Published: University of British Columbia 2010
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2429/30131
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.-30131
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-BVAU.-301312013-06-05T04:19:00ZPhonological development in twins after non-linear phonological and morphosyntactic interventionFeehan, Angela MThis study examined the phonological development of a set of 6-year-old male dizygotic twins with protracted phonological and morphosyntactic development. Each twin was given 16 weeks of therapy, 8 weeks of morphosyntactic treatment and 8 weeks of phonology treatment. These 8-week treatment blocks were ordered oppositely so that one twin received morphosyntactic treatment first while the other received phonology treatment first. The study investigated phonological changes after morphosyntax treatment (cross-domain generalization), after phonological treatment (direct treatment effect), and after the full 16 weeks (overall effects and treatment order effect). Specific changes within the phonological systems of the twins were interpreted from a constraint-based non-linear phonology point of view. Twin 1, who received morphosyntax treatment first, did not show an increase in phonological matches to adult targets after the morphosyntax treatment block. After the phonology treatment block, an increase in percentage match for treated word structures and phonological features was seen. Twin 2, who received phonology treatment first, showed an increase in percentage match for treated structures and features after phonology treatment. After morphosyntax treatment, a continued increase in phonological matches to adult targets was seen. These results imply that it may be important to target phonology directly with children who have both protracted phonological and protracted morphosyntactic development. Results also indicate that both morphosyntax treatment first and phonology treatment first strategies can facilitate phonological development and that phonology treatment first may allow for greater generalization in the phonological domain during morphosyntax treatment.University of British Columbia2010-11-24T21:09:31Z2010-11-24T21:09:31Z20102010-11-24T21:09:31Z2011-05Electronic Thesis or Dissertationhttp://hdl.handle.net/2429/30131eng
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
description This study examined the phonological development of a set of 6-year-old male dizygotic twins with protracted phonological and morphosyntactic development. Each twin was given 16 weeks of therapy, 8 weeks of morphosyntactic treatment and 8 weeks of phonology treatment. These 8-week treatment blocks were ordered oppositely so that one twin received morphosyntactic treatment first while the other received phonology treatment first. The study investigated phonological changes after morphosyntax treatment (cross-domain generalization), after phonological treatment (direct treatment effect), and after the full 16 weeks (overall effects and treatment order effect). Specific changes within the phonological systems of the twins were interpreted from a constraint-based non-linear phonology point of view. Twin 1, who received morphosyntax treatment first, did not show an increase in phonological matches to adult targets after the morphosyntax treatment block. After the phonology treatment block, an increase in percentage match for treated word structures and phonological features was seen. Twin 2, who received phonology treatment first, showed an increase in percentage match for treated structures and features after phonology treatment. After morphosyntax treatment, a continued increase in phonological matches to adult targets was seen. These results imply that it may be important to target phonology directly with children who have both protracted phonological and protracted morphosyntactic development. Results also indicate that both morphosyntax treatment first and phonology treatment first strategies can facilitate phonological development and that phonology treatment first may allow for greater generalization in the phonological domain during morphosyntax treatment.
author Feehan, Angela M
spellingShingle Feehan, Angela M
Phonological development in twins after non-linear phonological and morphosyntactic intervention
author_facet Feehan, Angela M
author_sort Feehan, Angela M
title Phonological development in twins after non-linear phonological and morphosyntactic intervention
title_short Phonological development in twins after non-linear phonological and morphosyntactic intervention
title_full Phonological development in twins after non-linear phonological and morphosyntactic intervention
title_fullStr Phonological development in twins after non-linear phonological and morphosyntactic intervention
title_full_unstemmed Phonological development in twins after non-linear phonological and morphosyntactic intervention
title_sort phonological development in twins after non-linear phonological and morphosyntactic intervention
publisher University of British Columbia
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/2429/30131
work_keys_str_mv AT feehanangelam phonologicaldevelopmentintwinsafternonlinearphonologicalandmorphosyntacticintervention
_version_ 1716587669752905728