Insect and agronomic responses in canola and wheat intercrops

Intercropping systems offer potential benefits relative to monocultures of increased crop yields and improved pest control through physical, chemical, or behavioural interference and the enhancement of natural enemy populations, prompting increased predation and parasitism. Intercrops of canola (Br...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hummel, Jeremy
Other Authors: Dosdall, Lloyd (Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science)
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10048/940
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-AEU.10048-940
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-AEU.10048-9402012-03-21T22:50:08ZDosdall, Lloyd (Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science)Hummel, Jeremy2010-01-15T19:24:51Z2010-01-15T19:24:51Z2010-01-15T19:24:51Zhttp://hdl.handle.net/10048/940Intercropping systems offer potential benefits relative to monocultures of increased crop yields and improved pest control through physical, chemical, or behavioural interference and the enhancement of natural enemy populations, prompting increased predation and parasitism. Intercrops of canola (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in various proportions were investigated at three sites in Alberta, Canada, in 2005 and 2006, to determine effects on 1) agronomic parameters, including crop grain and biomass yields, crop quality (canola oil and canola and wheat protein), lodging, soil microbial communities, and wheat leaf diseases; 2) pest insects, including flea beetle (Phyllotreta spp.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) damage to seedling canola and root maggot (Delia spp.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) adult collection numbers, egg populations, and canola taproot damage; and 3) beneficial insects, including ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and the predator-parasitoid Aleochara bilineata Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Crop yields were similar in intercrops and monocultures, and benefits of intercropping were observed in enhanced crop quality characteristics in some site-years. Neither soil microorganisms nor wheat leaf diseases generally responded to intercropping regimes. Intercropping did not reduce flea beetle damage to canola seedlings. Flea beetle damage was greatest at the first true-leaf stage of canola development. Although a thiamethoxam seed treatment reduced flea beetle herbivory, untreated plots generally did not sustain greater than 20% damage, suggesting that seed treatments were usually unnecessary. Adult Delia did not respond to intercropping canola with wheat, but egg populations were lower in intercrops on a land area basis. Canola taproot damage was as much as 13% reduced in intercrops compared to monocultures. Carabid beetles appeared to respond to qualities of the intercrops and monocultures, such as ground cover, rather than to the level of vegetational diversity itself, but carabid diversity was enhanced in diverse intercrops compared to canola monocultures in one site-year. Aleochara bilineata adult populations and parasitism rates were favoured in canola monocultures, but a temporal shift in A. bilineata adult collection numbers suggests reduced preference for canola monocultures in early summer. Benefits of canola-wheat intercrops identified in this study do not appear sufficient to recommend these cropping systems for widespread adoption in western Canada.578766 bytesapplication/pdfenHummel, Jeremy D., Lloyd M. Dosdall, George W. Clayton, T. Kelly Turkington, Newton Z. Lupwayi, K. Neil Harker, and John T. ODonovan (2009). Canola-wheat intercrops for improved agronomic performance and integrated pest management. Agronomy Journal 101: 1190-1197.Hummel, Jeremy D., Lloyd M. Dosdall, George W. Clayton, K. Neil Harker, and John T. ODonovan (2009). Journal Economic Entomology 102: 219-228.intercroppingcanolawheatDeliaPhyllotretaCarabidaeAleochara bilineataInsect and agronomic responses in canola and wheat intercropsThesisDoctor of PhilosophyDoctoralAgricultural, Food and Nutritional ScienceUniversity of Alberta2010-06Plant ScienceKeddie, Andrew (Biological Sciences)Clayton, George (Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science)Spaner, Dean (Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science)Leiffers, Vic (Renewable Resources)Boivin, Guy (Horticultural Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Qubec)
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic intercropping
canola
wheat
Delia
Phyllotreta
Carabidae
Aleochara bilineata
spellingShingle intercropping
canola
wheat
Delia
Phyllotreta
Carabidae
Aleochara bilineata
Hummel, Jeremy
Insect and agronomic responses in canola and wheat intercrops
description Intercropping systems offer potential benefits relative to monocultures of increased crop yields and improved pest control through physical, chemical, or behavioural interference and the enhancement of natural enemy populations, prompting increased predation and parasitism. Intercrops of canola (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in various proportions were investigated at three sites in Alberta, Canada, in 2005 and 2006, to determine effects on 1) agronomic parameters, including crop grain and biomass yields, crop quality (canola oil and canola and wheat protein), lodging, soil microbial communities, and wheat leaf diseases; 2) pest insects, including flea beetle (Phyllotreta spp.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) damage to seedling canola and root maggot (Delia spp.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) adult collection numbers, egg populations, and canola taproot damage; and 3) beneficial insects, including ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and the predator-parasitoid Aleochara bilineata Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Crop yields were similar in intercrops and monocultures, and benefits of intercropping were observed in enhanced crop quality characteristics in some site-years. Neither soil microorganisms nor wheat leaf diseases generally responded to intercropping regimes. Intercropping did not reduce flea beetle damage to canola seedlings. Flea beetle damage was greatest at the first true-leaf stage of canola development. Although a thiamethoxam seed treatment reduced flea beetle herbivory, untreated plots generally did not sustain greater than 20% damage, suggesting that seed treatments were usually unnecessary. Adult Delia did not respond to intercropping canola with wheat, but egg populations were lower in intercrops on a land area basis. Canola taproot damage was as much as 13% reduced in intercrops compared to monocultures. Carabid beetles appeared to respond to qualities of the intercrops and monocultures, such as ground cover, rather than to the level of vegetational diversity itself, but carabid diversity was enhanced in diverse intercrops compared to canola monocultures in one site-year. Aleochara bilineata adult populations and parasitism rates were favoured in canola monocultures, but a temporal shift in A. bilineata adult collection numbers suggests reduced preference for canola monocultures in early summer. Benefits of canola-wheat intercrops identified in this study do not appear sufficient to recommend these cropping systems for widespread adoption in western Canada. === Plant Science
author2 Dosdall, Lloyd (Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science)
author_facet Dosdall, Lloyd (Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science)
Hummel, Jeremy
author Hummel, Jeremy
author_sort Hummel, Jeremy
title Insect and agronomic responses in canola and wheat intercrops
title_short Insect and agronomic responses in canola and wheat intercrops
title_full Insect and agronomic responses in canola and wheat intercrops
title_fullStr Insect and agronomic responses in canola and wheat intercrops
title_full_unstemmed Insect and agronomic responses in canola and wheat intercrops
title_sort insect and agronomic responses in canola and wheat intercrops
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/10048/940
work_keys_str_mv AT hummeljeremy insectandagronomicresponsesincanolaandwheatintercrops
_version_ 1716391452382068736