Comparative analysis of Unmix/PMF modeling for PM₂.₅ source apportionment in rural and urban Kansas and a review of life cycle assessment on carbon footprint of beef production
Doctor of Philosophy === Department of Biological & Agricultural Engineering === Zifei Liu === The Unmix and Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) models for source apportionment were applied to evaluate prescribed burning impacts on air quality, identify model advantages, and establish a relation...
Main Author: | Liu, Yang |
---|---|
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/39285 |
Similar Items
-
Improving Source Apportionment of Urban Aerosol Using Multi-Isotopic Fingerprints (MIF) and Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF): Cross-Validation and New Insights
by: Carlos Eduardo Souto-Oliveira, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Application of an ensemble-trained source apportionment method to speciated pm2.5 data at the st. louis midwest supersite
by: Maier, Marissa Leigh
Published: (2012) -
Temporal Interpolation Modeling of Cincinnati’s Central Air Quality Monitoring Data for Use in Epidemiologic Studies: PM2.5 Source Apportionment using Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF)
by: Oroumiyeh, Farzan
Published: (2017) -
Source Apportionment of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Florence (Italy) by PMF Analysis of Aerosol Composition Records
by: Silvia Nava, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01) -
Comparison of Source Apportionment of PM2.5 Using PMF2 and EPA PMF Version 2
by: InJo Hwang, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01)