Dementia garden design: a framework to facilitate Kaplans’ attention restoration theory (A.R.T.) in environments of care

Master of Landscape Architecture === Department of Landscape Architecture/Regional and Community Planning === Timothy D. Keane === This thesis documents an exploratory design process that examines the efficacy of a framework for designing dementia gardens based on: theory, Stephen and Rachel Kaplan’...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Burch, Judith Gulliver
Language:en_US
Published: Kansas State University 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2097/13665
id ndltd-KSU-oai-krex.k-state.edu-2097-13665
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-KSU-oai-krex.k-state.edu-2097-136652017-03-03T15:44:41Z Dementia garden design: a framework to facilitate Kaplans’ attention restoration theory (A.R.T.) in environments of care Burch, Judith Gulliver Therapeutic gardens Restorative environments Supportive gardens Directed attention fatigue (D.A.T.) Alzheimer’s gardens Retirement community design Aging (0493) Health Care Management (0769) Landscape Architecture (0390) Master of Landscape Architecture Department of Landscape Architecture/Regional and Community Planning Timothy D. Keane This thesis documents an exploratory design process that examines the efficacy of a framework for designing dementia gardens based on: theory, Stephen and Rachel Kaplan’s Attention Restoration Theory (A.R.T.), (Kaplan and Kaplan, 1989) and Roger Ulrich’s Theory of Supportive Gardens (Ulrich, 1999); John Zeisel’s (2007) process for designing dementia gardens; and design details, Claire Cooper Marcus’ Garden Audit Tool (2007) and Moore’s analysis of exemplary dementia gardens (2007). It documents the integration of theory that is not specific to dementia gardens (Kaplans’ A.R.T. and Ulrich’s Theory of Supportive Gardens) with process (Zeisel) and programming elements that are specific to dementia gardens (Cooper Marcus’ Garden Audit Tool Kit and Moore’s exemplary dementia gardens). The framework was developed during an illustrative courtyard design project for a retirement center whose clientele included patients with varying need levels. Throughout the illustrative design project, knowledge of the four A.R.T. characteristics (Being Away, Fascination; Compatibility and Extent) guided design decision-making in an effort to create an engaging environment, where improved health outcomes and restorative person-environment interactions could occur. 2012-04-26T15:06:17Z 2012-04-26T15:06:17Z 2012-04-26 2012 May Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/2097/13665 en_US Kansas State University
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Therapeutic gardens
Restorative environments
Supportive gardens
Directed attention fatigue (D.A.T.)
Alzheimer’s gardens
Retirement community design
Aging (0493)
Health Care Management (0769)
Landscape Architecture (0390)
spellingShingle Therapeutic gardens
Restorative environments
Supportive gardens
Directed attention fatigue (D.A.T.)
Alzheimer’s gardens
Retirement community design
Aging (0493)
Health Care Management (0769)
Landscape Architecture (0390)
Burch, Judith Gulliver
Dementia garden design: a framework to facilitate Kaplans’ attention restoration theory (A.R.T.) in environments of care
description Master of Landscape Architecture === Department of Landscape Architecture/Regional and Community Planning === Timothy D. Keane === This thesis documents an exploratory design process that examines the efficacy of a framework for designing dementia gardens based on: theory, Stephen and Rachel Kaplan’s Attention Restoration Theory (A.R.T.), (Kaplan and Kaplan, 1989) and Roger Ulrich’s Theory of Supportive Gardens (Ulrich, 1999); John Zeisel’s (2007) process for designing dementia gardens; and design details, Claire Cooper Marcus’ Garden Audit Tool (2007) and Moore’s analysis of exemplary dementia gardens (2007). It documents the integration of theory that is not specific to dementia gardens (Kaplans’ A.R.T. and Ulrich’s Theory of Supportive Gardens) with process (Zeisel) and programming elements that are specific to dementia gardens (Cooper Marcus’ Garden Audit Tool Kit and Moore’s exemplary dementia gardens). The framework was developed during an illustrative courtyard design project for a retirement center whose clientele included patients with varying need levels. Throughout the illustrative design project, knowledge of the four A.R.T. characteristics (Being Away, Fascination; Compatibility and Extent) guided design decision-making in an effort to create an engaging environment, where improved health outcomes and restorative person-environment interactions could occur.
author Burch, Judith Gulliver
author_facet Burch, Judith Gulliver
author_sort Burch, Judith Gulliver
title Dementia garden design: a framework to facilitate Kaplans’ attention restoration theory (A.R.T.) in environments of care
title_short Dementia garden design: a framework to facilitate Kaplans’ attention restoration theory (A.R.T.) in environments of care
title_full Dementia garden design: a framework to facilitate Kaplans’ attention restoration theory (A.R.T.) in environments of care
title_fullStr Dementia garden design: a framework to facilitate Kaplans’ attention restoration theory (A.R.T.) in environments of care
title_full_unstemmed Dementia garden design: a framework to facilitate Kaplans’ attention restoration theory (A.R.T.) in environments of care
title_sort dementia garden design: a framework to facilitate kaplans’ attention restoration theory (a.r.t.) in environments of care
publisher Kansas State University
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/2097/13665
work_keys_str_mv AT burchjudithgulliver dementiagardendesignaframeworktofacilitatekaplansattentionrestorationtheoryartinenvironmentsofcare
_version_ 1718418393938264064