| Summary: | Submitted by PPG Ci?ncias Criminais (ppgccrim@pucrs.br) on 2017-10-06T14:04:34Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Disserta??o -LUCAS MINORELLI. 03-10-2017.pdf: 803130 bytes, checksum: 0b75b5b64ded1766bee3663498cd40eb (MD5) === Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-10-09T13:21:09Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
Disserta??o -LUCAS MINORELLI. 03-10-2017.pdf: 803130 bytes, checksum: 0b75b5b64ded1766bee3663498cd40eb (MD5) === Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-09T13:29:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Disserta??o -LUCAS MINORELLI. 03-10-2017.pdf: 803130 bytes, checksum: 0b75b5b64ded1766bee3663498cd40eb (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-12-15 === Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES === The object of analysis of this scientific research is the problem of the collision of duties in
criminal law and the main purpose was to investigate the legal-penal treatment given to such
cases. The methodology consists n the bibliographic review and analysis of legal precedents
related to the thematic, with the analysis of the proposals of resolution to the problem. The
present work is structured in three chapters. In the first chapter, it seeks to recover the
dogmatic, legislative and jurisprudential antecedents of five countries (Germany, Italy, Spain,
Portugal and Brazil). On the other hand, in the second chapter analyses the main proposals of
resolution of collision of duties, which were gathered in nine groups (causes of reduction of
the penalty, exclusion of the penalty, exclusion of mens rea, abstaining from the judgment of
guilt, exclusion from the responsibility of the fact, justification, theory of free space of law
and cause of exclusion of actus reus), analyzing the merits and demerits of each theoretical
construction. In the third and final chapter there is the taking of a position on the subject, in
which it is concluded that the collision of duties, despite having few similarities with the
necessity, has its application restricted to collisions between duties of action, having its own a foundation and legal consequences, and it is the sole cause of justification in cases involving innocent lives. === O objeto de an?lise da presente pesquisa cient?fica consiste na problem?tica da colis?o de
deveres em direito penal e o objetivo estabelecido foi o de investigar o tratamento jur?dicopenal
conferido a tais situa??es. Consiste a metodologia utilizada na revis?o bibliogr?fica e
an?lise de precedentes relacionados ? tem?tica, com a an?lise das propostas de resolu??o do
problema. O presente trabalho est? estruturado em tr?s cap?tulos. No primeiro cap?tulo buscase
resgatar os antecedentes dogm?ticos, legislativos e jurisprudenciais de cinco pa?ses
(Alemanha, It?lia, Espanha, Portugal e Brasil). No segundo cap?tulo ocorre a an?lise das
principais propostas de resolu??o de colis?o de deveres, as quais foram reunidas em nove
grupos (causas de diminui??o da pena, exclus?o da pena, exclus?o de culpabilidade, absten??o
do ju?zo da culpabilidade, exclus?o da responsabilidade do fato, exclus?o da ilicitude, teoria
do espa?o livre de direito e causa de exclus?o da tipicidade), analisando os m?ritos e
dem?ritos de cada constru??o te?rica. No terceiro e ?ltimo cap?tulo ocorre a tomada de
posi??o sobre o tema, no qual se conclui que a colis?o de deveres, apesar de possuir pontos de
encontro com o estado de necessidade, tem sua aplica??o restrita ?s colis?es entre deveres de
a??o, possuindo fundamento e consequ?ncias jur?dicas pr?prias, sendo a ?nica causa de
exclus?o da ilicitude em casos que envolvem vidas inocentes.
|
|---|
