| Summary: | Submitted by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-04-06T16:57:18Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_VANELISE_DE_PAULA_ALORALDO_COMPLETO.pdf: 1185343 bytes, checksum: 482c9ef066e38b31442711f7a73d2f25 (MD5) === Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-04-06T16:58:07Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_VANELISE_DE_PAULA_ALORALDO_COMPLETO.pdf: 1185343 bytes, checksum: 482c9ef066e38b31442711f7a73d2f25 (MD5) === Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-06T16:58:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_VANELISE_DE_PAULA_ALORALDO_COMPLETO.pdf: 1185343 bytes, checksum: 482c9ef066e38b31442711f7a73d2f25 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-01-20 === This study discusses the Family Warm-Up Program in the Missions Region based on the experience that has been developed in the municipality of Santo ?ngelo / RS through a partnership between the public policy of Social Assistance and the Judiciary. Therefore, it is based on the analysis of how those involved in this process comprise this Service that makes up the Special Social Protection of High Complexity. It was researched how this Program was implemented and how it is organized to meet this protection measure; Such as the extended family, the welcoming families and the technical staff realize that this type of reception is being developed, which represents an alternative to institutionalization. In order to get these answers, we chose as a methodological approach the research under mixed focus and for the analysis of the data collected - through interviews with semi-structured forms applied to nine (9) subjects (six (6) One (1) extended family and (2) staff of the technical team) and a systematic and documentary observation route made possible by three (3) pioneering agents ((1) a coordinator, (1) a social assistance secretary, and Judge) - the analysis of content according to Bardin (1977) in the light of the Materialist Historical Dialectic Method. The research was carried out at the headquarters of the Family Warm-Up Program and in the homes of families that temporarily shelter children and adolescents who were separated from the original family by judicial means. Reception services were considered to have segregated the hosted public for a long time, distancing them from their communities, depriving them of their freedom through hospitalization, offering no references of support in the institutions to the turnover of professionals and hardly welcoming them (according to the legislation), making it impossible for the family to live together. It is pointed out in this study the family reception as a possibility to guarantee fundamental rights historically neglected by the other reception modalities. It is evident the need to unite efforts, investing and directing the professional action of the teams to preserve the existing links with the extended family. In this sense, it is pointed out that the Program allows that links can be strengthened and, in addition, new ones are formed. It is warned that much more must be invested and directed the professional action of the teams and the intersectoral network for constant qualification of the families that they host, as well as orientation and social and family support to the definitive families. It was found, through the present research, that some experiences can generate good results so that the family and community coexistence is effectively guaranteed. === Neste estudo discute-se o Programa Fam?lia Acolhedora na Regi?o das Miss?es a partir da experi?ncia que vem sendo desenvolvida no munic?pio de Santo ?ngelo/RS atrav?s de parceria entre a pol?tica p?blica de Assist?ncia Social e o Poder Judici?rio. Para tanto, parte-se da an?lise de como os envolvidos nesse processo compreendem este Servi?o que comp?e a Prote??o Social Especial de Alta Complexidade. Pesquisou-se como este Programa foi implementado e como est? organizado para atender esta medida de prote??o; como a fam?lia extensa, as fam?lias acolhedoras e a equipe t?cnica percebem que est? sendo desenvolvida essa modalidade de acolhimento que representa uma alternativa ? institucionaliza??o. Para chegar a estas respostas, escolheu-se como caminho metodol?gico a pesquisa sob enfoque misto e para a an?lise dos dados coletados ? por meio de entrevista com formul?rios semiestruturados aplicados a nove (9) sujeitos participantes (seis (6) fam?lias acolhedoras, uma (1) fam?lia extensa e (2) profissionais da equipe t?cnica) e roteiro de observa??o sistem?tica e documental viabilizada por tr?s (3) agentes pioneiros ((1)uma coordenadora, (1) uma secret?ria da assist?ncia social e (1) um Juiz de Direito) ? a an?lise de conte?do segundo Bardin (1977) ? luz do M?todo Materialista Hist?rico Dial?tico. A pesquisa realizou-se na sede do Programa Fam?lia Acolhedora e nas resid?ncias das fam?lias que acolhem temporariamente crian?as e adolescentes afastados da fam?lia de origem por medida judicial. Considera-se que os servi?os de acolhimento, durante muito tempo, segregavam o p?blico acolhido, distanciando-os das suas comunidades, privavam a liberdade atrav?s da interna??o, n?o ofereciam refer?ncias de apoio nas institui??es pela rotatividade de profissionais e dificilmente tornavam breve o acolhimento (conforme enfatiza a legisla??o), impossibilitando a conviv?ncia em fam?lia. Aponta-se nesse estudo o acolhimento familiar como possibilidade de garantir direitos fundamentais historicamente negligenciados pelas outras modalidades de acolhimento. Evidencia-se a necessidade de unir esfor?os, investindo e direcionando a a??o profissional das equipes para preserva??o dos v?nculos existentes com a fam?lia extensa. Nesse sentido, aponta-se que o Programa propicia que elos possam ser fortalecidos, al?m de que, novos se formam. Alerta-se que muito ainda se deve investir e direcionar a a??o profissional das equipes e da rede intersetorial para capacita??o constante das fam?lias que acolhem, bem como orienta??o e apoio s?cio familiar ?s fam?lias definitivas. Descobriu-se, atrav?s da presente pesquisa que algumas experi?ncias podem gerar bons resultados para que a conviv?ncia familiar e comunit?ria seja efetivamente garantida.
|
|---|
