| Summary: | Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:48:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
438167.pdf: 113506 bytes, checksum: 18d81e4de29f28df9fdf93ed1ff1861a (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2011-01-13 === Collaboration rewarded directly inspired by Italian and American law also known as procedural collaboration or whistleblower reward, aims to contribute to the acquisition of investigative and evidentiary elements since investigation by traditional methods is blocked. The problem of strengthening methods of proof presents a possible conflict of interest in criminal justice s efficiency with rights of freedom and maintenance of procedural dynamics vigor, leading us to reflection on the theme from criteria given theory of principles and proportionality. Therefore, it values the latent constitutional tension on this theme. Moreover, the greatest difficulty in positive law is that Brazilian legislation does not set procedural rules to whistleblower award, which makes it difficult mainly regarding what procedure to be taken, how to manage pentiti, and probative valuation of co-defendants statements that collaborate with Justice. Hence, it is addressed how collaboration rewarded can be legitimately used by courts, preserving both its purpose and the fundamental guarantees of those involved. === A colabora??o premiada inspirada diretamente nos Direitos italiano e americano tamb?m denominada colabora??o processual ou dela??o premiada, objetiva contribuir para a aquisi??o de elementos investigativos e probat?rios ante bloqueio na investiga??o pelos m?todos tradicionais. O problema do refor?o nos m?todos probat?rios apresenta uma poss?vel colis?o do interesse na efici?ncia da justi?a penal com direitos de liberdade e de manuten??o da higidez na din?mica processual, levando a que se reflita sobre o tema a partir de crit?rios conferidos pela teoria dos princ?pios e pela proporcionalidade. Valoriza-se, assim, a tens?o constitucional latente no tema. Al?m disso, a maior dificuldade no direito positivo est? no fato de a legisla??o brasileira n?o estabelecer nenhum regramento de ordem processual para a coopera??o premiada, o que cria dificuldades principalmente quanto ao procedimento a ser utilizado, ? forma de gest?o dos pentiti, e ? valora??o probat?ria das declara??es dos corr?us que colaboram com a Justi?a. Aborda-se, assim, o modo como a colabora??o premiada poder? ser legitimamente utilizada pelos tribunais, preservando-se sua raz?o de ser e as garantias fundamentais dos envolvidos.
|
|---|
