O poder de punir o outro e o sentido do castigo provis?rio: atua??es, textos e discursos em c?maras criminais do TJRS

Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:46:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 438858.pdf: 2253470 bytes, checksum: b291af2d68a1cdd21666e14216eba176 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-03-29 === This research sets out to analyze the criminal legal field, using as a central object of study the distinct c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rizzardi, Paulo Renato Ardenghi
Other Authors: Ribeiro, Fernanda Bittencourt
Format: Others
Language:Portuguese
Published: Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4704
Description
Summary:Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:46:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 438858.pdf: 2253470 bytes, checksum: b291af2d68a1cdd21666e14216eba176 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-03-29 === This research sets out to analyze the criminal legal field, using as a central object of study the distinct constituent dimensions of sentences pronounced in two criminal chambers of the Court of Justice of Rio Grande do Sul, referring to the granting of the order of Habeas Corpus or maintenance of the preventive custody of the defendant. Understanding the process of construction of the sentences, inserted in a social context consisting of symbolic, cultural, subjective, valuable elements and by the multiplicity of existing meanings in the rituals of judgment and punishment of the transgressor, there is a need to extend the epistemological bases beyond the regulatory analysis and to proceed to an ethnographic study of the functioning and the relations that take place within the legal field. It is assumed that the legal constructions express values, retrace ideologies and constitute a field of intense struggles for conditions to say and decide for the right. It is used as a source of research the participant observation in hearings of two criminal chambers of the TJRS, the documentary analysis of decisions pronounced in the respective chambers, as well as the conduction of semi-structured interviews with magistrates. The analysis of the fight between agents and institutions for the monopoly of the legitimated violence, or either, the power to impose symbolically when and how the State can punish the other provisionally will occupy a relevant space in this study. === A presente pesquisa se prop?e analisar o campo jur?dico criminal, utilizando como objeto central de estudo as distintas dimens?es constitutivas de ac?rd?os proferidos em duas c?maras criminais do Tribunal de Justi?a do Rio Grande do Sul, referentes ? concess?o do pedido de H?beas Corpus ou manuten??o da pris?o preventiva do acusado. Entendendo o processo de constru??o das decis?es judiciais, inserido em um contexto social constitu?do por elementos simb?licos, culturais, subjetivos, valorativos e pela multiplicidade de significados existentes nos rituais de julgamento e puni??o do transgressor, vislumbra-se a necessidade de ampliar as bases epistemol?gicas para al?m da an?lise normativa e proceder a um estudo etnogr?fico do funcionamento e das rela??es que se d?o no interior do campo jur?dico. Parte-se da hip?tese de que as constru??es jur?dicas expressam valores, remontam ideologias e constituem um campo de intensas lutas pela condi??o de dizer o direito. Utiliza-se como fonte de pesquisa a observa??o participante em audi?ncias de duas c?maras criminais do TJRS, a an?lise documental de decis?es proferidas nas respectivas c?maras, bem como a realiza??o de entrevistas semi-estruturadas com magistrados. A an?lise da luta entre agentes e institui??es pelo monop?lio da viol?ncia legitimada, ou seja, o poder de impor simbolicamente quando e como o Estado pode punir provisoriamente o outro, ocupar? relevante espa?o neste estudo.