| Summary: | Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:33:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
462339.pdf: 739502 bytes, checksum: a5c2e9c1b9d675deb38c16405678afe2 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014-08-22 === Objective: The objective is to determine if ultrasound guidance for internal jugular vein catheterization can be safely performed, improving success rates and diminishing the procedure lenght and complication rates. Methods: Prospective randomized trial submiting 51 patients to central venous access. 1:1, on gender and age. The patients selected were between 0yrs 18yrs Tha data analysis was made utilizing the Mann-Whitney Test and Pearson s qui-squared. Results: 51 patients were submited to central venous access to internal jugular vein. 23 were US guided, and 28 procedures utilized landmark method. There was no difference betwwen groups on age and weight wise, The number of punctions to access the vein were smaller in the US group md(P25-P75) 3(2-5) X 1(1-2)p<0,001, and faster too. There was a decrease n complication rates using the US from 39% to 4,3% (p<0,009), Conclusions: The present data suggest that ultrasound guided catheterization of the internal jugular vein is more successful than the landmark method: was more rapidly done, had greater success rates and less complication rates and number of punctions. === Objetivo: Determinar se o US reduz n?mero de pun??es, tempo de procedimento e taxa de complica??es nos acessos venosos na veia jugular interna. M?todos: Estudo prospectivo, randomizado 1:1, em g?nero e idade, em pacientes de 0 a 18 anos submetidos a acesso venoso central. Para an?lise dos dados, utilizou-se o teste de Mann-Whitney e qui-quadrado de Pearson. Resultados: Foram realizados acessos em 51 pacientes, sendo 23 guiados por US. N?o houve diferen?a entre em grupos em rela??o ao peso, idade. O n?mero de pun??es necess?rias para acessar a veia foi menor com uso do US md (P25-P75) 3(2-5) X 1(1-2) p<0,001, bem como tempo de procedimento. Ocorreu uma diminui??o das complica??es com uso do ultrassom de 39% para 4,3% (p<0,009), Conclus?o: O acesso venoso na veia jugular interna guiado por ultrassom foi superior a t?cnica tradicional em termos de tempo de localiza??o da veia e de procedimento, de complica??es e de n?mero de pun??es.
|
|---|
