Evid?ncias de Validade da Bateria de Avalia??o Intelectual e Criativa - BAICA

• Main Author: Milian, Queila Guise
• Other Authors: Wechsler, Solange Muglia
• Format: Others
• Language: Portuguese
• Published: Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica de Campinas 2016
• Subjects: avalia??o psicol?gica; evid?ncias de validade; intelig?ncia; criatividade; psychological evaluation; validity evidences; intelligence; creativity; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA
• Online Access: http://tede.bibliotecadigital.puc-campinas.edu.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/330

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-04T18:28:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Queila Guise Milian.pdf: 769684 bytes, checksum: 29bed134eebd437c64b7d36b3e17145d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-02-05 === Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica de Campinas === The Brazilian culture needs to build and validate tests. The Intelectual and Creative Battery Evaluation - BAICA suggests the evaluation of two constructs in a single test: intelligence and creativity. BAICA is currently being developed in Brazil and is based on the american Woodcock Johnson III (WJ-III) Battery, which covers large areas of the C-H-C model of intelligence. The creativity evaluation is based on Torrance's creativity tests. This thesis aims at investigating validity evidences of criteria in Intelectual and Creative Battery Evaluation, youth and adult form - BAICA through a convergence source and making use of tests that have already been validated in Brazil and that succeed in measuring the same skills. Our sample was composed of high school freshmen from a public school, of which 48 were male and 51 were female. Age groups ranged from 15 to 17 years old. Participants were submitted to BAICA and to the following tests: Reasoning Battery Tests - BPR-5; Torrance Test of Creative Thinking, Verbal Form; Torrance Test of Creative Thinking, Figural form; Divided Attention Test - TEADI; and Alternate Attention Test - TEALT. The results were then analyzed according to Pearson's Correlation. For gender differences, we used the OneWay ANOVA for each of the tests applied. Results showed that there is significant correlation between all BAICA's cognitive subtests, as well as between all BPR-5, TEADI and TEALT subtests. Such correlation ranged from 0,28 to 0,52. The same was true for the creative verbal skills analyzed through BAICA and through Torrances' Test of Creative Thinking, verbal form, where significant correlations ranged from 0,26 to 0,54. Regarding figurative skills, there has been significant correlations between the skills analyzed, with the exception of the figurative originality and the picture's creative index. Finally, in what it regards gender, BAICA showed significant differences through ANOVA for the verbal thinking, figurative elaboration, verbal flexibility and expressive tiltles, as girls scored higher. We found little significant correlation for intelligence and creativity. We thus conclude that there is validity evidence for BAICA when it is used in convergence with other tests, but intellectual and creative skills show very weak relations. === Existe a necessidade de construir testes e valid?-los para a cultura brasileira. A Bateria de Avalia??o Intelectual e Criativa - BAICA prop?e a avalia??o de dois construtos em um ?nico teste, a intelig?ncia e a criatividade. A BAICA est? sendo desenvolvida no Brasil, baseada na bateria americana Woodcock Johnson III (WJ-III), que atende ?s ?reas amplas do modelo C-H-C de intelig?ncia. A parte da avalia??o da criatividade ? fundamentada nos testes de criatividade de Torrance. Neste sentido, o objetivo deste trabalho foi investigar as evid?ncias de validade de crit?rio da Bateria de Avalia??o Intelectual e Criativa em Jovens - BAICA, por fonte de converg?ncia, com testes j? validados no nosso pa?s que medem as mesmas habilidades. A amostra foi composta por 99 alunos do primeiro ano do Ensino M?dio de um escola p?blica, sendo 48 do g?nero masculino e 51 do g?nero feminino, com idades variando entre 15 e 17 anos. Foram aplicados nos participantes a BAICA e os seguintes testes: a Bateria de Provas de Racioc?nio - BPR-5, o teste Pensando Criativamente com Palavras de Torrance, o testes Pensando Criativamente com Figuras de Torrance, o Teste de Aten??o Dividida - TEADI e o Teste de Aten??o Alternada - TEALT. Os resultados obtidos foram analisados segundo a Correla??o de Pearson e foi realizada a An?lise Univariada da Vari?ncia para as diferen?as de g?nero, para cada instrumento aplicado. Os resultados apontaram uma correla??o significativa entre todos os subtestes cognitivos da BAICA e todos os subtestes da BPR-5, TEADI e TEALT apresentando uma correla??o significativa que variou de 0,28 ? 0,52. O mesmo ocorreu com as habilidades criativas verbais analisadas na BAICA e no teste de Palavras de Torrance, com correla??es significativas de 0,26 ? 0,54. Nas habilidades figurais houve correla??es significativas com as habilidades analisadas, exceto a originalidade figurativa e o ?ndice criativo figural. Com rela??o ao g?nero, a BAICA apresentou diferen?a significativa por meio da ANOVA para os subtestes de racioc?nio verbal, elabora??o figural, flexibilidade verbal e t?tulos expressivos, com melhores pontua??es para as meninas. Intelig?ncia e criatividade n?o apresentaram fortes rela??es e poucas correla??es significativas foram encontradas. Conclui-se a partir de tais dados que a BAICA possui evid?ncias de validade de crit?rio, quando utilizada converg?ncia com outros testes e que as habilidades intelectuais e criativas possuem fracas rela??es entre si.