| Summary: | Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-11-03T21:39:42Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
FernandaGondimLemosDeOliveiraMedeiros_DISSERT.pdf: 2018995 bytes, checksum: 637011e566f152bb815b954afcd07a2b (MD5) === Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-11-17T23:58:29Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
FernandaGondimLemosDeOliveiraMedeiros_DISSERT.pdf: 2018995 bytes, checksum: 637011e566f152bb815b954afcd07a2b (MD5) === Made available in DSpace on 2017-11-17T23:58:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
FernandaGondimLemosDeOliveiraMedeiros_DISSERT.pdf: 2018995 bytes, checksum: 637011e566f152bb815b954afcd07a2b (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-09-29 === Introdu??o: A disfun??o temporamandibular (DTM) definida como um conjunto de dist?rbios que envolvem os m?sculos mastigat?rios, a articula??o temporomandibular e estruturas associadas. A DTM pode gerar um grande impacto sobre a vida di?ria do paciente, limitando sua qualidade de vida e do sono. Diante da variedade de tratamentos existentes, torna-se necess?rio determinar quais inferferem nestes fatores. Objetivo: Avaliar a efetividade de diferentes terapias conservadores na qualidade de vida, qualidade do sono e dor em pacientes com DTM. Metodologia: O ensaio cl?nico foi constitu?do de 89 pacientes e distribu?dos em quatro modalidades aleatoriamente: placa oclusal (PO; n=24), terapia manual (TM; n=21), aconselhamento (AC; n=19) e placa oclusal em associa??o com aconselhamento (PAC; n=25). As cr?terios foram avaliados por meio da Escala Visual Anal?gica de Dor (EVA), ?ndice de Qualidade do Sono de Pittsburgh (PSQI), World Health Organization Quality Of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) e Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Foi utilizado o teste estat?stico Slip Plot ANOVA com n?vel de confian?a de 95%. Resultados: Todas as terapias foram efetivas ao longo do tempo, influenciando a dor (p<0,001), qualidade do sono (p=0,001), impacto da sa?de oral na qualidade de vida (p<0,001) e qualidade de vida geral (p<0,006), sem diferen?a estat?stica entre elas. Conclus?o: As terapias conservadoras estudadas foram eficazes na melhoria da dor, qualidade do sono e qualidade de vida, entretanto, nenhum grupo terap?utico foi superior ao outro. === Introduction: Temporamandibular dysfunction (TMD) can have a major impact on a patient's daily life, limiting their quality of life and sleep. In view of the variety of existing treatments, it is necessary to determine which ones inferred in these factors. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of different conservative therapies in the quality of life, sleep and pain in TMD diagnosed patients. Methods: The clinical trial consisted of 89 patients and distributed in four modalities: occlusal splints (n=24), manual therapy (n = 21), counseling (n = 19) and occlusal splints in association with counseling (n = 25), counseling and occlusal s in association with counseling. The critters were evaluated by means of the Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Slip Plot ANOVA statistical test was used to observe the results, with a confidence level of 95%. Results: All therapy modalities were successful in TMD treatment over time with regard to pain (p <0.001), sleep quality (p = 0.001), oral health impact on quality of life (p <0.001) and quality of life (p<0.006), but there was no significant difference between therapies. Conclusion: The conservative therapies studied were effective in improving pain, quality of sleep and quality of life, however, no therapeutic group was superior to the other.
|
|---|
