| Summary: | Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-04-03T21:33:40Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
MauricioAlvesBezerraJunior_DISSERT.pdf: 1013357 bytes, checksum: f168e1d5e7cf4a831ae44cd78bae2bca (MD5) === Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-04-10T19:02:32Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
MauricioAlvesBezerraJunior_DISSERT.pdf: 1013357 bytes, checksum: f168e1d5e7cf4a831ae44cd78bae2bca (MD5) === Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-10T19:02:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
MauricioAlvesBezerraJunior_DISSERT.pdf: 1013357 bytes, checksum: f168e1d5e7cf4a831ae44cd78bae2bca (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-12-15 === Esta disserta??o apresenta um estudo sobre o di?logo G?rgias, de Plat?o, interpretandoque essa obra ? uma reflex?o sobre a cr?tica plat?nica ? ret?rica sof?stica, desenvolvendoa ideia de que ela ? empeiria, produtora de lisonja (???????????). Encontramos elementos amb?guos que revelam que, apesar de criticar a persuas?o (?????), S?crates a reconhece como um requisito essencial para conduzir oelenchos(???????). No di?logo, S?crates v?-se diante de tr?s interlocutores, G?rgias, Polo e C?cicles. Este ?ltimo sendo o seu algoz principal. Reconhecemos o di?logo em seu contexto hist?rico-cultural, visto que a Ret?rica, e seu elemento de persuas?o, eram insumos constitutivos da cultura grega. Consideramos que o intuito de Plat?o ? repensar os elementos ret?ricos e persuasivos dos sofistas a fim de alhures, expor a ?verdadeira ret?rica?, ou seja, a Filosofia. Para isso, Plat?o faz uma an?lise da ret?rica persuasiva, colocando frente ao seu mestre um expoente da sof?stica, G?rgias; e procura desvelar suaarte (?????). Contudo, apesar de podermos reconhecer nele os elementos necess?rios, o di?logo finaliza sem di?logo, uma vez que n?o h? persuas?ode nenhumdos lados. Consideramos que todos esses pontos ser?o relevantes para compreendermos a persuas?o (?????) como um dos elementos basilares na oralidade grega e da dial?tica plat?nica. === This essay presents a study about the Gorgiasdialogue, by Plato, expounding that this piece is a reflection on the Platonic criticism to sophist Rhetoric, developing the idea that it is empeiria, producer of flattery (???????????). We find ambiguous elements that show that despite criticizing persuasion (?????), Socrates recognizes it as an essential requisite to conduct the elenchos (???????). In the dialogue, Socrates sees himself before three interlocutors, Gorgias, Polo and Callicles. The latter being his one chief tormentor. We acknowledge the dialogue in its historical-cultural context, since Rhetoric and its element of persuasion were Greek culture's constitutive inputs. We consider that Plato's intent is to rethink the sophists rhetorical and persuasive elements in order to expose the "true rhetoric", that it, Philosophy. For this, Plato makes an analysis of the persuasive rhetoric, placing before his master an exponent of the sophistry, Gorgias; and seeks to unveil its art (?????). However, although we can recognize in it the necessary elements, the dialogue ends without a dialogue, since there is no persuasion on either sides. We consider that all these points will be relevant to understand persuasion (?????) as one of the basic elements of Greek orality and Platonic dialectics.
|
|---|
