| Summary: | Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-03-20T21:03:00Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
EvelynFernandesErickson_DISSERT.pdf: 706523 bytes, checksum: 8adb88738bde33540238e2807b96f5f4 (MD5) === Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-03-23T00:17:48Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
EvelynFernandesErickson_DISSERT.pdf: 706523 bytes, checksum: 8adb88738bde33540238e2807b96f5f4 (MD5) === Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-23T00:17:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
EvelynFernandesErickson_DISSERT.pdf: 706523 bytes, checksum: 8adb88738bde33540238e2807b96f5f4 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-12-12 === O pluralismo l?gico vem recentemente chamando aten??o, com v?rios autores contestando
sua natureza. O pluralismo l?gico ? a posi??o que diz que h? mais de uma
l?gica correta ou leg?tima, o que pode ser articulado de diferentes maneiras. A presente
disserta??o participa nesse debate explorando o framework do ?-entailment
no contexto de variedades do pluralismo presentes na literatura. O ?-entailment ?
uma no??o de consequ?ncia l?gica que ? capaz de expressar outras rela??es, como
as l?gicas multi-dimensionais. Em particular, esse estudo examina quatro posi??es
sobre o pluralismo: o pluralismo ecl?tico de Shapiro, o pluralismo atrav?s de GTT
de Beall e Restall, o pluralismo intra-te?rico de Hjortland e os pluralismos atrav?s
de teoria das demonsta??es de Restall e Paoli. Ser? mostrado como o ?-entailment
se encaixa nessas variedades de pluralismo e tamb?m como fica em falta em certos
aspectos. O objetivo da disserta??o ? tanto contribuir para a discuss?o sobre o pluralismo
l?gico quanto expandir a discuss?o sobre o ?-entailment e outras no??es de
consequ?ncia l?gica desse g?nero. === Logical pluralism has recently been given much attention, with numerous authors
contesting its nature. In a broad sense, logical pluralism is the view that there
are more than one correct or legitimate logic, which can be articulated in different
ways. The present study participates in this debate by exploring the framework
of ?-entailment in the context of several of varieties of pluralism. ?-entailment is
a logical consequence relation, which may express different consequence relations,
such as those of many-dimensional logics. In particular, this study examines four
different takes on pluralism: Shapiros?s eclectic pluralism, Beall and Restall?s GTT
pluralism, Hjortland?s intra-theoretic pluralism and Restall and Paoli?s pluralism
based on proof-theory. It will be shown how ?-entailment fits into these varieties
of pluralism, and a discussion is presented on how ?-entailment falls short is some
aspects. The aim is to contribute to the discussion on logical pluralism as well as to
expand the discussion about ?-entailment and consequence relations of this sort.
|
|---|
