Percep??es no processo de licenciamento de empreedimentos em energia e?lica e conflitos socioambientais no munic?pio de S?o Miguel do Gostoso

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-03-14T22:20:59Z No. of bitstreams: 1 IsaacNewtonLucenaFernandesDeQueiroz_DISSERT.pdf: 13416870 bytes, checksum: fac93ca661cac003c1faf22b8931fecd (MD5) === Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yaho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Queiroz, Isaac Newton Lucena Fernandes de
Other Authors: 26154463472
Language:Portuguese
Published: PROGRAMA REGIONAL DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM DESENVOLVIMENTO E MEIO AMBIENTE - PRODEMA 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/22271
Description
Summary:Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-03-14T22:20:59Z No. of bitstreams: 1 IsaacNewtonLucenaFernandesDeQueiroz_DISSERT.pdf: 13416870 bytes, checksum: fac93ca661cac003c1faf22b8931fecd (MD5) === Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-03-16T18:40:57Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 IsaacNewtonLucenaFernandesDeQueiroz_DISSERT.pdf: 13416870 bytes, checksum: fac93ca661cac003c1faf22b8931fecd (MD5) === Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-16T18:40:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 IsaacNewtonLucenaFernandesDeQueiroz_DISSERT.pdf: 13416870 bytes, checksum: fac93ca661cac003c1faf22b8931fecd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-12-09 === Sob o ponto de vista econ?mico, o aproveitamento do potencial e?lico trouxe ao estado do Rio Grande do Norte vultosos investimentos de capital nacional e estrangeiro, transformandose em interesse pol?tico priorit?rio e representando uma alternativa ? depend?ncia do regime hidroel?trico que predomina no pa?s. Tal matriz energ?tica tem ainda um vi?s ambiental, na medida em que seus impactos no meio f?sico s?o comparativamente menores. Ademais, ? considerada pelos acordos internacionais do clima, como a principal alternativa sustent?vel para o controle do efeito estufa a partir da redu??o da queima de combust?veis f?sseis. Contudo, a implanta??o de torres e?licas tem gerado quest?es sociais graves, identificados em estudos ao redor do mundo, especialmente no que tange ? apropria??o de territ?rios, impactos paisag?sticos, ru?dos, dentre outros. Trata-se de uma quest?o de injusti?a ambiental, onde os efeitos nocivos da atividade recaem justamente sobre os mais desamparados. Particularmente, seus efeitos tamb?m podem ser sentidos no munic?pio de S?o Miguel do Gostoso, localizado no litoral setentrional do RN. Na comunidade de Morro dos Martins, onde se desenvolveu a pesquisa, essa problem?tica se repetiu, ainda que em 2011 o empreendimento tenha sido objeto de um procedimento de licenciamento ambiental previsto na lei brasileira. A problem?tica surge, ent?o, em verificar se o licenciamento alcan?a seus objetivos no tocante ao lado social da sustentabilidade e, tamb?m, se este possui um car?ter democr?tico. Para tanto, foi realizada uma observa??o participante no local, bem como foi analisado o processo em quest?o e obtidos dados diretos da Prefeitura do Munic?pio. Durante a observa??o, foram realizadas 20 entrevistas com moradores que venderam suas terras ? empresa que construiu o parque. Dentre os resultados, observou-se que a popula??o vendeu suas terras ? empresa, assediados pelo dinheiro e desamparados pelas institui??es, e agora n?o t?m mais como produzir, bem como fizeram mau uso do produto da venda dos seus bens. Al?m disso, os moradores se queixam da in?rcia do ?rg?o ambiental na defesa de seus interesses, sendo que os regulamentos n?o concedem poder algum de decis?o ?s pessoas diretamente afetadas pelos impactos das obras, o que n?o se traduz em ferramenta verdadeiramente democr?tica. Conclui-se que somente ap?s a ado??o de m?todos que contemplem a participa??o da popula??o de maneira efetiva, atendendo aos princ?pios da justi?a ambiental, bem como a cria??o de uma associa??o que represente os interesses populares e os defenda em face de novas arbitrariedades. === From the economic point of view, the exploitation of the wind potential brought to the state of Rio Grande do Norte large investments of national and foreign capital, becoming a priority political interest and representing an alternative to the dependence of the hydroelectric regime that prevails in the country. This energy matrix also has an environmental bias, insofar as its impacts on the physical environment are comparatively smaller. In addition, it is considered by international climate agreements as the main sustainable alternative for controlling the greenhouse effect by reducing the burning of fossil fuels. However, the deployment of wind towers has generated serious social issues, identified in studies around the world, especially in what concerns the appropriation of territories, landscape impacts, noise, among others. It is a question of environmental injustice, where the harmful effects of the activity fall precisely on the most helpless. In particular, its effects can also be felt in the municipality of S?o Miguel do Gostoso, located on the northern coast of the RN. In the community of Morro dos Martins, where the research was developed, this problem was repeated, even though in 2011 the project was subject to an environmental licensing procedure provided according to the brazilian law. The problem then arises in verifying if licensing reaches its objectives with respect to the social side of sustainability and also if it has a democratic character. For that, a participant observation was carried out in the place, as well as the process in question was analyzed and direct data obtained from the Municipality. During the observation, 20 interviews were conducted with residents who sold their land to the company that built the park. Among the results, it was observed that the population sold their lands to the company, harassed by the money and abandoned by the institutions, and now they have no more how to produce, as well as they made misuse of the product of the sale of their goods. In addition, residents complain about the environmental agency's inertia in defending its interests, and the regulations do not grant any decision power to those directly affected by the impacts of the works, which does not translate into a truly democratic tool. It is concluded that only after the adoption of methods that contemplate the participation of the population in an effective way, taking into account the principles of environmental justice, as well as the creation of an association that represents popular interests and defends them in the face of new arbitrariness.