Programa de Avalia??o de Desempenho: elementos constitutivos e pressupostos na pr?tica avaliativa

Made available in DSpace on 2015-02-24T17:22:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 AnaCCG_DISSERT.pdf: 4036055 bytes, checksum: 3c3aae85a12b93812a56f6bb0640cd04 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-09-02 === This study analyzes the perceptions of technical and administrative UFPA, in relation to the insertio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gomes, Ana Clotildes Colares
Other Authors: CPF:15590534453
Format: Others
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repositorio.ufrn.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/18286
Description
Summary:Made available in DSpace on 2015-02-24T17:22:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 AnaCCG_DISSERT.pdf: 4036055 bytes, checksum: 3c3aae85a12b93812a56f6bb0640cd04 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-09-02 === This study analyzes the perceptions of technical and administrative UFPA, in relation to the insertion of the components and assumptions of DBP in evaluation practice. Addresses the history, concepts, meanings, about AD methods, skills, evaluation skills, the APF and AD UFPA and Programme itself. The research is characterized as a hypothetical-deductive, descriptive and applied, using the case study. Data were analyzed using a quantitative approach, using the descriptive and inferential statistics. Data were collected through the application of questionnaires to 222 technical and administrative searched IFES, not occupants of FG and CD. The results indicate that the factors perceived in relation to the constituent elements such as: evaluation practice, measurement of competence, program management, timing, individual skills and fundamentals of the program and those related to assumptions such as: democratic process, integrative perspective, character development and pedagogical continuous evaluation practices are perceived in the evaluation process. The study concludes that comparing the results of the constituent elements and assumptions of the PAD of thechnical-administrative UFPA, it can be said about a tendency to change, though subtle, compared to the traditional model of AD, directed only to the granting of career progression for a new logic based on the results, showing an early effectiveness of the program evaluation practice by law and by the Institution. The results are confirmatory of advance evaluation practice in the institution, more so than has previously been expected, which demonstrates the value of scientific criteria of scientific research === Este estudo objetiva analisar a percep??o dos t?cnico-administrativos da UFPA, em rela??o ? inser??o dos elementos constitutivos e pressupostos do PAD na pr?tica avaliativa. Aborda-se o hist?rico, conceitos, significados, m?todos sobre AD, compet?ncias, avalia??o por compet?ncias, AD na APF e na UFPA e o Programa em si. A pesquisa caracteriza-se como hipot?tico-dedutiva, descritiva e aplicada, utilizando a t?cnica de estudo de caso. Os dados foram analisados segundo a abordagem quantitativa, utilizando-se a estat?stica descritiva e inferencial. Os dados foram coletados por meio da aplica??o de 222 question?rios aos t?cnico-administrativos da IFEs pesquisada, n?o ocupantes de FG e CD. Os resultados indicam que os fatores percebidos em rela??o aos elementos constitutivos como: pr?tica avaliativa, mensura??o da compet?ncia, gest?o do programa, periodicidade, compet?ncias individuais e fundamentos do programa e os relacionados aos pressupostos como: processo democr?tico, perspectiva integradora, car?ter pedag?gico e desenvolvimento cont?nuo na pr?tica avaliativa s?o percebidos no processo avaliativo. O estudo conclui que relacionando os resultados sobre os elementos constitutivos e os pressupostos do PAD dos t?cnicoadministrativos da UFPA, ? poss?vel afirmar sobre uma tend?ncia ? mudan?a, embora sutil, em rela??o ao modelo tradicional de AD, voltado somente para concess?o de progress?o funcional, para uma nova l?gica baseada em resultados, demonstrando um in?cio de efetividade do Programa na pr?tica avaliativa pela legisla??o vigente e pela Institui??o. Os resultados s?o confirmat?rios de avan?o na pr?tica avaliativa da institui??o, mais at? do que se esperava ter previamente, o que demonstra o valor dos crit?rios de cientificidade da pesquisa cient?fica