Di?logos e aprendizagens na forma??o em agronomia para assentados

• Main Author: Scalabrin, Rosemeri
• Other Authors: CPF:24238333420
• Format: Others
• Language: Portuguese
• Published: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte 2014
• Subjects: Educa??o do campo; Di?logo; Aprendizagem; Educa??o superior; Movimentos sociais; Curso de agronomia; Rural education; Dialogue; Learning process; Higher education; Social movements; Agronomy course; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
• Online Access: http://repositorio.ufrn.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/14353

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:36:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 RosemeriS_TESE.pdf: 3277969 bytes, checksum: 0a0bceaa42d1e5fbf47379715fbad3cd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-06-20 === Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior === This thesis aims to investigate the Agronomy course in the perspective of the graduation course for the settlers of the Universidade Federal do Par?- Marab?. This course requires a partnership with the social movements of the North region of the country, with the purpose to understand knowledge production and how learning process occurs from the point of interaction and reliable relationships which are established in the organization during the course. The base of theses studies is to reflect of how the dialogue and learning processes occurred during the Agronomy course and resulted in changing in the teachers behavior and in the other integrated members of the group and mainly in the graduating settlers students. These changings happens as a consenquence of the dialogue production between the most varied areas, different people and institutions which take collective decisions. I observe educational actions, researches, extention concepts of extension and also development researches presented in the educative actions discussed by Freire (1985), Sim?es (2001, 2003) e de Amartya Sen (2000). The theory in which I am basing these studies are based in Boaventura de Souza Santos Sim?es (2001, 2003) and Amartya Sen (2000). Methodologically I analyse knowledge production by sudying the thesis and scientific works related to rural education, social movements, university and higher education in the last 20 years. I analyze the scientific works of all settler students, and besides, I do open interviews with the students, as well as, with the teachers and the leaders of social movements (MST, FETAGRI, CPT, EFA/FATA). I organize and analyze all the speeches from the ecological knowledge as defined by Boaventura de Souza Santos (2006). Finally, I visit five towns of municipal districts of the southeast of Par?, which represents the final methodological part of the research, in order to verify in loco the practices of the experiments purposed as final activity of the Agronomy course. I organize the work in five areas composed by the occupational process and the initiatives which emerged from them; development model and the social and environmental consequences; I also organize the university role and the relationship established between people and institutions which gave origin to the Agronomy course of UFPA and the programs developed in the region; conjuncture of creation of the groups of settled students, curriculum, principles and focus on the course and the experienced actions; developed practices in the course and the relations of reliability experienced internally and externally to the Academy, the learning and dialogue promoted by the course. I believe that the dialogue has caused changes in the organization of the knowledge and in the educative practices of the teachers, as well as, in the socio-productive practices of the regressed settled students === Esta tese investiga o Curso de Agronomia na forma??o de assentados da Universidade Federal do Par?-Campus Marab?, por demanda e parceria com movimentos sociais da Regi?o Norte do pa?s, com o prop?sito de compreender as aprendizagens (produ??o do conhecimento) a partir de trocas e rela??o de confiabilidade no outro, constru?das na organiza??o e realizadas do Curso. O pressuposto que orienta este estudo ? que os di?logos e aprendizagens ocorridas no curso de Agronomia provocaram mudan?as nos professores, nos integrantes dos movimentos e, principalmente, nos assentados egressos. Tais mudan?as acontecem pela promo??o do di?logo entre conhecimentos, ?reas, pessoas e institui??es nas tomada de decis?es e no desenvolvimento das a??es coletivas. Observo as concep??es de educa??o, de pesquisa, de extens?o e de desenvolvimento presente nos discursos e nas pr?ticas que orientam as a??es relativas ? educa??o discutidas por Freire (1985), Sim?es (2001, 2003) e de Amartya Sen (2000) e assumo como referencial te?rico b?sico as id?ias de Boaventura de Souza Santos (1985; 1989; 2000; 2004; 2005; 2006; 2008), Paulo Freire (1975; 1981; 1985; 1997; 1996) e Miguel Altiere (1989). Metodologicamente analiso a produ??o do conhecimento atrav?s das teses e disserta??es relativas a Educa??o do Campo, Movimentos Sociais, Universidade e Educa??o Superior, nos ?ltimos 20 anos. Analiso as monografias de conclus?o de curso de todos os educandos assentados, al?m de realizar entrevistas abertas com cada um/a. Utilizo a entrevista aberta, tamb?m, com os docentes do curso e com os dirigentes dos de movimentos sociais (MST, FETAGRI, CPT, EFA/FATA). Organizo e analiso os discursos a partir da id?ia de ecologia de saberes como definido por Boaventura de Souza Santos (2006). Finalmente, realizo visitas em cinco munic?pios da mesorregi?o Sudeste do Par?, recorte metodol?gico final da pesquisa, para verifica??o in locu da execu??o dos experimentos propostos como atividade final do Curso de Agronomia. Organizo o trabalho em cinco eixos composto pelo processo de ocupa??o e as iniciativas que dele emergiram; modelo de desenvolvimento e as conseq??ncias sociais e ambientais; cria??o e papel da Universidade e as rela??es estabelecidas entre pessoas e institui??es que deram origem ao Curso de Agronomia na UFPA e aos programas desenvolvidos na regi?o; conjuntura de cria??o da turma de educandos assentados, proposta curricular, princ?pios e foco do curso e as a??es vivenciadas; as pr?ticas desenvolvidas no curso e as rela??es de confiabilidade vivenciadas interna e externamente a academia, os aprendizados e os di?logos promovidos pelo curso. Considero que o di?logo provocou mudan?as na organiza??o do conhecimento e nas pr?ticas educativas dos professores, bem como nas pr?ticas s?cioprodutivas dos educandos egressos e dos assentados