O princ?pio constitucional da legalidade administrativa e os limites do controle das atividades-fim das ag?ncias reguladoras pelo Tribunal de Contas da Uni?o

• Main Author: Queiroz, Marco Aur?lio Marques de
• Other Authors: CPF:93693320410
• Format: Others
• Language: Portuguese
• Published: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte 2014
• Subjects: Controle; Legalidade; Discricionariedade; Control; Legality; Discretionarity; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Online Access: http://repositorio.ufrn.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/13915

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:27:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MarcoAMQ_DISSERT.pdf: 1365785 bytes, checksum: 9d62080297e130926befdceccb003789 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-12-14 === Analysis of the role of the Union Accounts Court on the control of regulatory agencies, with the objective of identifying the limits of the Institution s acting on the aim activities of the agencies, particularly the control limits of the Court on the merits of discretionary administrative actions, taking into account the autonomy of these entities in the model of regulatory state. Analyzes the principle of administrative legality, the control of public administration, state s action in the economy and facing regulatory agencies, their emergence, evolution and characteristics. Includes the study of jurisprudence and doctrinal differences, as for the limits of the powers conferred by the constitutional legislator to Federal Court of Audit, regarding the control of agencies aim activities, or, in other terms, their regulatory and inspector missions of market, under the principle of administrative legality. Performs analysis, based on case studies involving Court s audits on regulatory agencies. Are appreciated differences within the Institution about the their decisions effects - imposed or not - as regards the arrangements to be adopted by regulatory agencies to correct the flaws and omissions found during Court s inspections, in which content of the act of public agent, despite their technical nature, can happen the criterion of convenience and opportunity === An?lise do papel do Tribunal de Contas da Uni?o no controle das ag?ncias reguladoras, com o objetivo de apontar os limites da atua??o do TCU sobre as atividades-fim das ag?ncias, particularmente os limites do Tribunal sobre o m?rito dos atos administrativos discricion?rios, levando em conta a autonomia dessas entidades no modelo de Estado regulat?rio. Examina o princ?pio da legalidade administrativa, o controle da Administra??o P?blica, a atua??o do Estado perante a economia e as ag?ncias reguladoras, seu surgimento, evolu??o e caracter?sticas. Compreende o estudo das diverg?ncias jurisprudenciais e doutrin?rias quanto aos limites da compet?ncia conferida pelo legislador constituinte ? Corte de Contas Federal, quanto ao controle das atividades-fim das ag?ncias, ou seja, quanto ? sua miss?o reguladora e fiscalizadora do mercado, ? luz do princ?pio constitucional da legalidade administrativa. Realiza a an?lise tendo por base estudo de casos concretos envolvendo fiscaliza??es do TCU sobre as ag?ncias reguladoras. S?o apreciadas as diverg?ncias no seio do Tribunal quanto aos efeitos a imprimir ?s suas decis?es impositivos ou n?o a respeito das medidas a serem adotadas pelas ag?ncias reguladoras para corrigir as falhas e omiss?es encontradas durante as fiscaliza??es do TCU, em cujo conte?do do ato do agente p?blico, apesar de seu car?ter t?cnico, tamb?m possa haver crit?rio de conveni?ncia e oportunidade