| Summary: | Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T20:13:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
2008 - Giuseppa Maria Daniel Spenillo.pdf: 1620863 bytes, checksum: 178ac481d27ca04b2af80abf88e78378 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2008-04-17 === This work considers the recent social mobilization to promote the notion of
communication as a human right by entities and activists as confrontation to the intergovernmental
proposal that approaches contemporary phenomena linked to the uses of
information and communication technologies (ICTs) in a global process called World
Summit on Information Society (CMSI), approved by ONU in 2001 and carried through
two stages, in 2003 and 2005. The necessity to raise the level of communication up to
the international and central platforms of debate on which society we want ,
established on an expectation of change summarized in the expressions another world
is possible and another communication is possible has been growing since 2001, in
the establishment of World Social Forums. This movement leads entities and activists to
articulation CRIS gatherings - Communication Rights on the Information Society, that is
perceived as a great world campaign for the right to communication. In Brazil an
articulation CRIS was formed in 2003. The social history of the mobilization processes
with the purpose of communication changes in Brazil is investigated according to a
configurational approach and a sociogenesis perspective (Norbert Elias). There is a dual
focus: a) the social relations which are established searching the dynamics for change
and the political struggle for the right to communication and b) the habitus that support
collective and individual actions, strengthen positions, and freeze certain social
dynamics (such as the ones crystallized in laws), while being renewed in the social
dynamics (as the search for other forms of political fight), which form social
configurations. By studying the fight for the right to communication, needs and
expectations have been found, imminently human issues that, for Elias, generate the
rhythm and directions of social change. The issues dealt with above underlie our
perception that rights, although resulting from political struggles and social power
redistribution, meet an ideal of equality as derived from an individualistic conception of
society. Therefore, the understanding of Human Right, does not account for less visible
social inequalities such as those related to communication and information due to
the individualistic framework upholding it. === Tratamos neste trabalho da mobiliza??o social recente para formula??o da no??o de
comunica??o como um direito humano, promovida por entidades e ativistas como
enfrentamento da proposta inter-governamental de abordar fen?menos contempor?neos
ligados aos usos de tecnologias de informa??o e comunica??o (TICs) num processo
global denominado C?pula Mundial sobre a Sociedade da Informa??o (CMSI),
aprovada na ONU em 2001 e realizada em duas etapas, em 2003 e 2005. A necessidade
de elevar a comunica??o ao patamar do debate internacional e central sobre qual
sociedade queremos , fundada numa expectativa de mudan?a sintetizada nas express?es
um outro mundo ? poss?vel e uma outra comunica??o ? poss?vel vem tomando
f?lego desde 2001, nos processos de constru??o dos F?runs Sociais Mundiais. Esse
movimento leva ? reuni?o de entidades e ativistas na articula??o CRIS
Communication Rights on the Information Society. No Brasil ? formada uma articula??o
CRIS a partir de 2003. ? a hist?ria social desses processos de mobiliza??o em fun??o de
mudan?as na comunica??o, no Brasil, que investigamos a partir de uma abordagem
configuracional e na perspectiva da sociog?nese (Norbert Elias). Para tal, entrevistamos
entre 2006 e 2007, participantes da articula??o CRIS Brasil e, ainda, da mobiliza??o por
mudan?as na comunica??o no Brasil, e acompanhamos, no per?odo, eventos sobre
comunica??o e informa??o. No estudo da luta pelo direito ? comunica??o descobrimos
necessidades e expectativas, quest?es iminentemente humanas que, para Elias,
produzem os ritmos e as dire??es da mudan?a social. Estas quest?es fundamentam
nossa tese de que direitos, embora resultem de lutas sociais e sejam redistribui??es de
poder nas estruturas sociais, atendem a um ideal de igualdade proveniente da concep??o
individualista de sociedade. A compreens?o de Direito Humano, portanto, n?o d? conta
de desigualdades sociais menos vis?veis como as de comunica??o e informa??o pelo
pr?prio arcabou?o individualista que a sustenta.
|
|---|
