| Summary: | Submitted by Diego dos Santos Borba (dborba@uffs.edu.br) on 2017-04-13T20:24:22Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
BICICGO.pdf: 888938 bytes, checksum: 9e08aa182a91775247bea991fadc01bc (MD5) === Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-13T20:24:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
BICICGO.pdf: 888938 bytes, checksum: 9e08aa182a91775247bea991fadc01bc (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014-06-25 === A partir do conceito de met?fora e da no??o de efeito metaf?rico fundamentados no trabalho do franc?s Michel P?cheux, esta disserta??o prop?e analisar as met?foras de leitura no discurso da Cr?tica Liter?ria, para compreender o funcionamento do pol?tico-ideol?gico no discurso metaf?rico. A disputa ideol?gica na produ??o do conhecimento, segundo P?cheux, est? na materialidade das met?foras que uma ci?ncia usa para ?compreender e se fazer compreender?. Questionando, ent?o, as met?foras de leitura, como est?o formuladas no discurso da Cr?tica Liter?ria, o presente estudo leva a considerar que a constitui??o hist?rico-discursiva das met?foras n?o possui uma origem, e sim diferentes formas de funcionamento, conjunturalmente tomadas pela disputa entre diferentes concep??es de leitura. A partir desse entendimento, surgem duas considera??es: a primeira ? que n?o existe uma mem?ria homog?nea que estaria na ?origem? da met?fora; a segunda ? que a met?fora ? produzida conforme o contexto de produ??o, podendo se deslocar para dentro de diferentes forma??es discursivas. O funcionamento do discurso metaf?rico marca um posicionamento pol?tico-ideol?gico, cujo resultado aponta para a rela??o entre uma pr?tica cient?fica e uma pr?tica pol?tica, materializadas nas met?foras de leitura. Trata-se, dessa maneira, de um estudo que problematiza o discurso metaf?rico a partir do posicionamento pol?tico-ideol?gico que o sujeito cr?tico liter?rio assume ao interpretar. Esta pesquisa traz uma contribui??o importante para os estudos sobre a met?fora, na perspectiva da An?lise de Discurso, al?m de subsidiar a pr?pria Cr?tica Liter?ria, na compreens?o do processo hist?rico que marca as met?foras que ela usa para compreender o funcionamento dos sentidos numa obra liter?ria. === From the concept of metaphor and metaphorical effect?snotion based on Michel P?cheux?swork, this dissertation proposes to examine the metaphors of reading on the discourse of literary criticism to understand the functioning of the political-ideological discourse in metaphorical discourse. The ideological struggle in the production of knowledge, according to P?cheux, is the materiality of metaphor that a science uses ?to understand and be understood?.So, questioning the metaphors of reading, as they are formulated in the discourse of literary criticism, this study leads to the conclusion that historical and discursive constitution of metaphors does not have a source, but different ways of working, conjuncturally taken by the dispute between different conceptions of reading. Based on this understanding, two considerations arise: the first is that there is no homogeneous memory that would be the ?origin? of metaphor; the second is that the metaphor is produced according to the context of production and can move within different discursive formations. The functioning of metaphoric discourse marks a political-ideological stance which the results points to the relationship between scientific practice and political practice, embodied in the metaphors of reading. It is, thus, a study that discusses the metaphoric discourse from the political-ideological stance that the literary critic subject assumes when he interprets. This research makes an important contribution to studies on metaphor, from the perspective of discourse analysis, in addition to supporting the literary criticism itself on understanding the historical process that marks the metaphors it uses to understand the functioning of the senses in a literary work.
|
|---|
