| Summary: | Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2017-04-10T18:18:36Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
2012 - Marcus Andr? Ferreira S?.pdf: 393876 bytes, checksum: 9d184a085854acf9828da371a7e2b732 (MD5) === Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-10T18:18:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
2012 - Marcus Andr? Ferreira S?.pdf: 393876 bytes, checksum: 9d184a085854acf9828da371a7e2b732 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-07-17 === CAPES === The present experiment aimed to verify if different vacuum pump negative pressures (150, 280 e 400 mmHg) can influence the oocyte recovery rate per preovulatory follicle aspirated. Hence, 21 estrous cycles from regularly cycling mares were subject to OPU. The estrous cycles were sorted in three groups (G150=150 mmHg; G280=280 mmHg; G400=400 mmHg) in the following sequence: G150= 150mmHg (n=6); G280= 280mmHg (n=7); G400= 400mmHg (n=6). During the estrus, the ovarian activity of the mares was daily monitored using the transrectal ultrasound technique until the largest follicle reached at least a diameter of 35mm and endometrial edema secore 2.5 was identified on ultrasonographic evaluation, when 1000UI of hCG administered intravenuous. Approximately 24 hours after the hCG administered, the mares were monitored by rectal palpation and ultrasonography every six hours to follicle evaluation. In the case of imminent indication of ovulation or formation of hemorrhagic follicle, the follicle would be immediately aspirate. The aspirations occurred in 32,45?1,92h after the hCG administration. The transvaginal aspirations were performed with ultrasound apparatus equipped with a convex transducer of 5,0mHz with polyethylene guide containing a double lumen needle of 12G. The follicular fluid collected from each follicle was frozen and the aspirated content was transferred to a Petri Dishes and thoroughly examined on the stereomicroscope to identify the oocytes presence. In order to statistically evaluate the influence of different pressures on the oocyte recovery, were used Chi-Squared test (a 5% significance) and Fisher Exact Test, when recommended. The recovery rate was 31,57% (6/19), being 16,66 % (1/6) in G150, 42,85 % (3/7) in G280 and 33,33 % (2/6) in G400. There was no difference among groups (p>0,05). From the results of the current study, it is possible to conclude that the negative pressure of the vacuum pump is not a determining factor to increase the oocyte recovery and other aspects would possibly have more significant influence . === O presente experimento visou investigar se diferentes press?es negativas da bomba de v?cuo (150, 280 e 400mmHg) podem influenciar a taxa de recupera??o oocit?ria por fol?culo preovulat?rio aspirado. Para tanto, foram submetidos a ovum pick up 21 ciclos estrais de ?guas ciclando regularmente, distribu?dos em tr?s grupos (G150= 150 mmHg; G280= 280 mmHg; G400= 400 mmHg), na seguinte ordem: G150= 150 mmHg (n=6); G280= 280 mmHg (n=7); G400= 400 mmHg (n=6), definida por meio de sorteio. Durante estro, a atividade ovariana das ?guas foi monitorada diariamente atrav?s da t?cnica ultrassonogr?fica transretal at? que o maior fol?culos atingisse pelo menos 35mm de di?metro e edema endometrial grau 2,5 durante a avalia??o ultrassonogr?fica, quando ent?o administrou-se 1000UI de hCG, por via endovenosa. Aproximadamente 24 horas ap?s a administra??o de hCG as ?guas foram submetidas a exame ultrassonogr?fico a cada seis horas para avalia??o folicular. Caso houvesse indica??o iminente de ovula??o ou forma??o de fol?culo hemorr?gico, o mesmo seria imediatamente aspirado. As aspira??es ocorreram em 32,45?1,92h ap?s a aplica??o do hCG fazendo uso de ultrassom equipado com um transdutor convexo de 5,0mHz com guia de polietileno contendo uma agulha de duplo l?men de 12G. O fluido folicular coletado de cada fol?culo foi congelado e o conte?do aspirado transferido para uma Placa de Petri e examinado minuciosamente ao estereomicrosc?pio para localiza??o dos o?citos. Para avaliar estatisticamente o efeito das diferentes press?es sobre a recupera??o oocit?ria, foi utilizado o teste Qui-Quadrado (a 5% de signific?ncia) e Fisher Exato, quando recomendado. A taxa de recupera??o foi de 31,57% (6/19), sendo 16,66 % (1/6) no G150, 42,85 % (3/7) no G280 e 33,33 % (2/6) no G400. N?o houve diferen?a entre os grupos (p>0,05). Atrav?s dos resultados obtidos no presente estudo ? poss?vel concluir que a press?o negativa da bomba de v?cuo utilizada n?o ? o determinante para elevar a recupera??o oocit?ria, possivelmente havendo outros fatores atuando de modo mais importante.
|
|---|
