| Summary: | Submitted by Roger Guedes (roger.guedes@fjp.mg.gov.br) on 2015-02-02T18:30:32Z
No. of bitstreams: 2
license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)
O processo de formula????o da estrat??gia_Tese.pdf: 3341862 bytes, checksum: 61b52d251281fd9dfe3fd2f84834d450 (MD5) === Approved for entry into archive by Roger Guedes (roger.guedes@fjp.mg.gov.br) on 2015-02-02T18:31:57Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2
license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)
O processo de formula????o da estrat??gia_Tese.pdf: 3341862 bytes, checksum: 61b52d251281fd9dfe3fd2f84834d450 (MD5) === Made available in DSpace on 2015-02-02T18:31:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)
O processo de formula????o da estrat??gia_Tese.pdf: 3341862 bytes, checksum: 61b52d251281fd9dfe3fd2f84834d450 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013 === Funda????o Jo??o Pinheiro === Nesta tese pretende-se questionar os pressupostos de racionalidade instrumental do processo de planejamento governamental, a partir da an??lise do processo de formula????o dos Planos Mineiros de Desenvolvimento Integrado e seus desdobramentos nos Planos Plurianuais de A????o Governamental no per??odo de 1995-2011. Neste sentido, descreve-se o ambiente em que os Planos foram formulados, analisam-se suas premissas, os processos de prioriza????o das estrat??gias, al??m do processo argumentativo contido nos Planos. Para tanto, nesta tese adota-se o estudo de caso ??nico e longitudinal, combinado com o m??todo da grounded theory, e an??lise de discurso para o tratamento e an??lise dos dados. A partir deste estudo, o autor defende o planejamento estrat??gico governamental como um ritual constru??do socialmente que visa dar legitimidade as decis??es governamentais. Assim, o processo de planejamento como institui????o pol??tica suficientemente adapt??vel, complexa e coesa deveria ser capaz de absorver e ordenar a participa????o de grupos de interesse numa arena capaz de assistir ?? luta entre esses interesses, sem que o conflito acabe em caos. Nesta perspectiva, o processo de planejamento estrat??gico governamental deveria alocar recursos e valores a favor da sociedade, num esfor??o conjunto de produzir e implementar pol??ticas p??blicas de maneira democr??tica. O autor defende que o processo de constru????o do planejamento governamental ?? uma constru????o social. Como tal, muitas vezes, apoia-se em s??mbolos e rituais cujos significados, em alguma medida, s??o compartilhados socialmente. Na constru????o deste discurso legitimador, o processo de planejamento estrat??gico governamental se torna um espa??o de competi????o entre discursos e regimes de verdade. Entre os s??mbolos usados na constru????o dos Planos, no sentido de se obter legitimidade, alguns se destacaram: a efici??ncia do setor privado, a racionalidade t??cnica, o l??der-her??i e a import??ncia pol??tica de Minas Gerais. Al??m dos s??mbolos, o processo de planejamento governamental ?? marcado por diversos ritos, por exemplo, a participa????o social ou a participa????o do Poder Legislativo, que visam conferir legitimidade ao processo. Observa-se ainda que estes rituais de participa????o s??o extremamente formais e n??o produzem participa????o efetiva. Pelo contr??rio, o que se observou nos processos estudados ?? que a constitui????o destes Planos est?? diretamente ligada a um n??mero muito pequeno de pessoas que fazem parte do Poder Executivo. Assim, o processo de planejamento estrat??gico governamental deve ser visto como uma s??rie de eventos que dependem de uma cadeia complexa de intera????es rec??procas, sendo que, muitas vezes, esta cadeia n??o pode ser prevista ou controlada. Assim, apresenta-se uma cr??tica ao planejamento estrat??gico ???cl??ssico???, com seus diagramas e seus gr??ficos, que transmite um ideal de que tudo ficar?? bem desde que as regras sejam seguidas e que as boas pr??ticas gerenciais sejam respeitadas. O que se observa nos processos estudados ?? um processo fluido, marcado pelas idas e vindas. Na formula????o do planejamento estrat??gico governamental de Minas Gerais e seus instrumentos verifica-se a exist??ncia de fluxos distintos e simult??neos. De um lado, discute-se a vis??o, a an??lise do ambiente externo, os objetivos priorit??rios e as estrat??gias, de outro, s??o formulados os programas. === This thesis aims to question the assumptions of instrumental rationality of government planning process, from the analysis of the process of formulation of Integrated Development Plans Miners and their consequences Plans Multi-year Government Action in the period 1995-2011. In this, describes the environment in which plans were formulated, analyze its premises, processes of prioritization of strategies beyond the argumentative process contained in the Plans. Therefore, in this thesis we adopt the single case and longitudinal study, combined with the method of grounded theory and discourse analysis for the processing and analysis of data. From this study, the author defends the government strategic planning as a socially constructed ritual that seeks to legitimize government decisions. Thus, the planning process as a political institution sufficiently adaptable, and cohesive complex should be able to absorb and organize the participation of interest groups in an arena able to watch the fight between these interests without the conflict ends in chaos. In this perspective, the process of strategic planning government should allocate resources and values in favor of the company, in a joint effort to produce and implement public policies in a democratic manner. The author argues that the process of construction of government planning is a social construction. As such, it often relies on symbols and rituals whose meanings, to some extent, are socially shared. In the construction of this discourse legitimizing the government strategic planning process becomes a space of competition between discourses and regimes of truth. Among the symbols used in the construction of plans, in order to obtain legitimacy, some stood out: the efficiency of the private sector, technical rationality, the hero-leader and the political importance of Minas Gerais. In addition to the symbols, the government planning process is marked by several rites, for example, social participation or the participation of the legislature, which aim to confer legitimacy. We also observe that these rituals are extremely formal participation and do not produce effective participation. Rather, what is observed in the studied processes is that the formation of these plans is directly linked to a very small number of people who are part of the executive branch. Thus, the governmental strategic planning process should be viewed as a series of events that depend on a complex chain of reciprocal interactions, and often this chain can not be predicted or controlled. Thus, it presents a critique of strategic planning "classic", with their diagrams and their graphs, which transmits an ideal that everything will be fine as long as the rules are followed and that good management practices are respected. What is observed in the processes studied is a fluid process, marked by the comings and goings. In the formulation of strategic planning government of Minas Gerais and its instruments verified the existence of separate, simultaneous streams. On the one hand, discusses the vision, the analysis of the external environment, the priority goals and strategies, on the other, are formulated programs. === Governo e Pol??tica
|
|---|
