Summary: | Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2016-06-22T13:48:47Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
rosamariadossantosmansosakamoto.pdf: 1698223 bytes, checksum: c6bc74b86887e6527cfc70b81bea5852 (MD5) === Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2016-07-13T15:30:08Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
rosamariadossantosmansosakamoto.pdf: 1698223 bytes, checksum: c6bc74b86887e6527cfc70b81bea5852 (MD5) === Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-13T15:30:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
rosamariadossantosmansosakamoto.pdf: 1698223 bytes, checksum: c6bc74b86887e6527cfc70b81bea5852 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-10-31 === O sistema federal de acreditação do ensino superior federal, no Brasil, que articula regulação
e a avaliação da graduação foi consolidado a partir da integração da Lei do Sistema Nacional
de Avaliação da Educação Superior (SINAES), do Decreto nº 5.773 de 2006 e da Portaria
MEC nº 40 de 2007, reeditada em 2010. Esses diplomas estabelecem parâmetros e insumos
que devem estar atendidos para a oferta de cursos de graduação, seja pela rede privada ou pela
rede pública federal. A observação dos reflexos desse sistema sobre a realidade da UFJF,
demonstrou que a concepção e a operacionalização do sistema federal de acreditação não
considerou as especificidades e as especialidades próprias de sua natureza, enquanto autarquia
especial e enquanto universidade pública, e adotou uma condução inadequada e
excessivamente controladora e reducionista. === The federal accreditation system of the Federal Higher Education in Brazil, that controls the
regulation and the evaluation of under graduates, was consolidated from the integration of the
Law of the National System of Higher Education Assessment (SINAES), Decree number
5773 of 2006 and the Ministry of Education and Culture (MEC) Ordinance number 40 of
2007, reissued in 2010. These documents fix the parameters and the inputs that should be met
so that the Federal Under-graduation System can be provided, both by private and public
education establishments, including the federal universities. A close look at that system´s
outcomes to the reality of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF) revealed that the
concept and the operational terms of the federal accreditation system did not take into
account its specific features and specialties, being it a special agency and a public university,
and adopted an inadequate, overly controlling and reductionist bias.
|