| Summary: | Submitted by Julie_estagiaria Moraes (julie.moraes@fgv.br) on 2012-01-30T17:32:55Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
000056773.pdf: 42379590 bytes, checksum: ce28f08cd57cd8ed7126e6a66beea1a4 (MD5) === Made available in DSpace on 2012-01-30T17:33:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
000056773.pdf: 42379590 bytes, checksum: ce28f08cd57cd8ed7126e6a66beea1a4 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 1991 === Culture has been playing a central role, in the mediation of class struggle in Brazil. The 'intelligentsia' acted as if it lingered over all classes (30s and 40s); tried to resume political leadership, ideologizing the nation (50s and 60s); was censored, tortured and exiled (70s). Since the beginning of the 80s, part of the intellectuals have joined political parties, in an attempt to work out a democratic project for the country, together with the proletarian classes. Nevertheless, pragmatism and conciliation seem to continue to be the best approach to analise the relationship between the majority of the 'intelligentsia' and the Brazilian government. For those, grants and subventions seem to be far more important than ethics and/or democracy. === Desde o inicio do século, a Cultura vem desempenhando papel central na mediação da luta de classes, no Brasil. A 'intelligentsia' comportou-se como se pairasse sobre todas as classes (anos 30 e 40); buscou assumir a liderança ideológica da nação (anos 50 e 60); sofreu censura, tortura e exílio (anos 70) . Desde o inicio da década de 80, parte dos intelectuais vem buscando, na militância partidária, o caminho para a construção de um projeto de sociedade contra-hegemônico e democrático. Para grande parte da 'intelligentsia', entretanto, pragmatismo e conciliação parecem continuar a ser a melhor receita de vida. Na sua visão de mundo, apoios e subvenções governamentais aparentemente valem mais que ética e democracia.
|
|---|
