| Summary: | Submitted by Raniere Barreto (raniere.barros@ufvjm.edu.br) on 2018-05-07T17:53:28Z
No. of bitstreams: 2
license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)
rodrigo_silva_colares.pdf: 3761580 bytes, checksum: b009addae00984b9254b793f44de0488 (MD5) === Rejected by Rodrigo Martins Cruz (rodrigo.cruz@ufvjm.edu.br), reason: Verificar t?tulo. on 2018-05-14T18:41:07Z (GMT) === Submitted by Raniere Barreto (raniere.barros@ufvjm.edu.br) on 2018-05-15T17:59:40Z
No. of bitstreams: 2
license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)
rodrigo_silva_colares.pdf: 3761580 bytes, checksum: b009addae00984b9254b793f44de0488 (MD5) === Rejected by Rodrigo Martins Cruz (rodrigo.cruz@ufvjm.edu.br), reason: devolvendo.
Aproveito para uma observa??o. Lan?ar o n?mero de p?ginas da ?ltima pag numerada. N?o considere a ficha. on 2018-05-15T19:04:17Z (GMT) === Submitted by Raniere Barreto (raniere.barros@ufvjm.edu.br) on 2018-10-26T19:20:22Z
No. of bitstreams: 2
license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)
rodrigo_silva_colares.pdf: 3761580 bytes, checksum: b009addae00984b9254b793f44de0488 (MD5) === Approved for entry into archive by Rodrigo Martins Cruz (rodrigo.cruz@ufvjm.edu.br) on 2018-11-10T11:08:21Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2
license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)
rodrigo_silva_colares.pdf: 3761580 bytes, checksum: b009addae00984b9254b793f44de0488 (MD5) === Made available in DSpace on 2018-11-10T11:08:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)
rodrigo_silva_colares.pdf: 3761580 bytes, checksum: b009addae00984b9254b793f44de0488 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017 === Um bom projeto arquitet?nico deve considerar o conforto do usu?rio, sendo que um dos principais fatores que dificultam na execu??o do mesmo ? a posi??o de cada c?modo. Este problema ? relevante, considerando a posi??o do sol em rela??o ao terreno, sendo que parte da edifica??o ficar? posicionada com sua parede recebendo energia t?rmica no per?odo da tarde, gerando desconforto no ambiente. Este fato ? agravante em regi?es em que as altas temperaturas s?o comuns quase o ano todo. A redu??o do fluxo de calor para dentro da resid?ncia se torna fundamental, minimizando a utiliza??o de aparelhos que reduzem a temperatura. A pesquisa tem como objetivo determinar uma melhor configura??o para a alvenaria de veda??o, avaliando sua efici?ncia t?rmica. Ap?s os ensaios realizados, constatou-se que as paredes duplas com tijolos de 8 ou 9 furos, com ou sem EPS entre as camadas, melhoram de forma significativa o conforto t?rmico no interior das edifica??es. A configura??o com reboco de 2cm em ambos os lados apresentou melhor custo x benef?cio. === Disserta??o (Mestrado Profissional) ? Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Tecnologia, Sa?de e Sociedade, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, 2017. === A good architectural design should regard the comfort of the user, since one of the main factors that hampers its execution is the position of each room. This problem is relevant, considering the position of the sun in relation to the terrain, since the building part will be positioned with its wall receiving thermal energy in the period of the afternoon, generating discomfort in the environment. This fact is aggravating in regions that high temperatures are common almost all year. Reducing the flow of heat into the home becomes essential, minimizing the use of equipments that decrease the temperature. The research aims to determine a better configuration for the mansory of the seal, evaluating it?s thermal efficiency. After the tests, it was verified that double walls with 8 or 9 hole-bricks, with or without EPS between the layers, significantly improve the thermal comfort inside the buildings. The configuration with 2 cm plaster on both sides showed better cost x benefit.
|
|---|
