Case Study of the “No On 37” Coalition Against the Deceptive Food Labeling Scheme: Public Relations Strategies & Tactis, Ethically Problematic Communication, and the First Amendment
The debate surrounding one’s right to know what is in one’s food has increased in popularity since 2012 when California became the first state to vote on Proposition 37 which would have mandated the labeling of genetically modified organisms. Proposition 37 was defeated due to the public relations c...
Main Author: | Ferrero, Eugenia Pia |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Published: |
ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/communication_diss/75 http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1077&context=communication_diss |
Similar Items
-
GM Labeling Regulation by Plebiscite: Analysis of Voting on Proposition 37 in California
by: John Bovay, et al.
Published: (2016-05-01) -
Lying and the First Amendment
by: Halper Thomas
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Students' First and Fourth Amendment Rights in the Digital Age: An Analysis of Case Law
by: Nowak, Benjamin Adam
Published: (2014) -
CYBERSPACE INVADES THE FIRST AMENDMENT: Where do we go from here?
by: Deaton, Dollie
Published: (2001) -
Effects of Cost and Campaign Advertising on Support for California's Proposition 37
by: Brandon R. McFadden, et al.
Published: (2013-08-01)