Self-Concepts of Homeless People in an Urban Setting: Processes and Consequences of the Stigmatized Identity

This study investigates social psychological strategies homeless persons use to develop and maintain the self while homeless. To understand this topic, I apply the identity theory of Stryker, self-esteem ofRosenberg, self-efficacy of Gecas and Schwalbe, and homeless identity meanings and behaviors o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Parker, Josie L
Format: Others
Published: Digital Archive @ GSU 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/sociology_diss/65
http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=sociology_diss
id ndltd-GEORGIA-oai-digitalarchive.gsu.edu-sociology_diss-1064
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-GEORGIA-oai-digitalarchive.gsu.edu-sociology_diss-10642013-04-23T03:25:32Z Self-Concepts of Homeless People in an Urban Setting: Processes and Consequences of the Stigmatized Identity Parker, Josie L This study investigates social psychological strategies homeless persons use to develop and maintain the self while homeless. To understand this topic, I apply the identity theory of Stryker, self-esteem ofRosenberg, self-efficacy of Gecas and Schwalbe, and homeless identity meanings and behaviors of Burke. Additionally, I examine what is needed to no longer be homeless. In all, 326 surveys were collected at six different homeless service agencies such as shelters and meal sites. The data analysis includes descriptive statistics and multivariate regression. The results only partially support identity theory in that interactive commitment (increased number of homeless friends) predicts salience (frequently invoking the homeless identity across different situations) which predicts increased length of time in role. However, affective commitment and centrality of the homeless identity have no effect. This study does confirm Snow andAnderson’s findings that homeless persons on the streets for a shorter period of time will distance themselves from the homeless identity, while those on the streets longer will embrace the homeless identity. As opposed to previous research, I find that the majority of homeless respondents do not have low self-esteem or self-efficacy. Instead it is certain factors such as being homeless longer and more often, accepting the homeless identity, viewing the homeless identity as most important, little to no family support and having a high school diploma (or less) that result in homeless persons having low self-esteem or self-efficacy. With homeless identity meanings, people thinking negatively about themselves is the result of having more homeless friends, being homeless longer and more often, possessing low self-esteem and low self-efficacy. Placing great importance on homeless identity behaviors such as helping other homeless people and staying sober influence these outcomes: thinking positively about the self, stronger ties with other homeless people, more homeless friends and invoking the homeless identity more often in different situations. For homeless people to obtain housing, two factors, income and social support systems, are most important. Of all the control variables, sleeping on the streets and multiple disabilities demonstrate the greatest impact for almost all of the independent variables. The implications of these findings are discussed. 2012-05-05 text application/pdf http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/sociology_diss/65 http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=sociology_diss Sociology Dissertations Digital Archive @ GSU Homeless Stigmatized Identity Identity Theory Self-Esteem Self-Efficacy Disabilities
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Homeless
Stigmatized Identity
Identity Theory
Self-Esteem
Self-Efficacy
Disabilities
spellingShingle Homeless
Stigmatized Identity
Identity Theory
Self-Esteem
Self-Efficacy
Disabilities
Parker, Josie L
Self-Concepts of Homeless People in an Urban Setting: Processes and Consequences of the Stigmatized Identity
description This study investigates social psychological strategies homeless persons use to develop and maintain the self while homeless. To understand this topic, I apply the identity theory of Stryker, self-esteem ofRosenberg, self-efficacy of Gecas and Schwalbe, and homeless identity meanings and behaviors of Burke. Additionally, I examine what is needed to no longer be homeless. In all, 326 surveys were collected at six different homeless service agencies such as shelters and meal sites. The data analysis includes descriptive statistics and multivariate regression. The results only partially support identity theory in that interactive commitment (increased number of homeless friends) predicts salience (frequently invoking the homeless identity across different situations) which predicts increased length of time in role. However, affective commitment and centrality of the homeless identity have no effect. This study does confirm Snow andAnderson’s findings that homeless persons on the streets for a shorter period of time will distance themselves from the homeless identity, while those on the streets longer will embrace the homeless identity. As opposed to previous research, I find that the majority of homeless respondents do not have low self-esteem or self-efficacy. Instead it is certain factors such as being homeless longer and more often, accepting the homeless identity, viewing the homeless identity as most important, little to no family support and having a high school diploma (or less) that result in homeless persons having low self-esteem or self-efficacy. With homeless identity meanings, people thinking negatively about themselves is the result of having more homeless friends, being homeless longer and more often, possessing low self-esteem and low self-efficacy. Placing great importance on homeless identity behaviors such as helping other homeless people and staying sober influence these outcomes: thinking positively about the self, stronger ties with other homeless people, more homeless friends and invoking the homeless identity more often in different situations. For homeless people to obtain housing, two factors, income and social support systems, are most important. Of all the control variables, sleeping on the streets and multiple disabilities demonstrate the greatest impact for almost all of the independent variables. The implications of these findings are discussed.
author Parker, Josie L
author_facet Parker, Josie L
author_sort Parker, Josie L
title Self-Concepts of Homeless People in an Urban Setting: Processes and Consequences of the Stigmatized Identity
title_short Self-Concepts of Homeless People in an Urban Setting: Processes and Consequences of the Stigmatized Identity
title_full Self-Concepts of Homeless People in an Urban Setting: Processes and Consequences of the Stigmatized Identity
title_fullStr Self-Concepts of Homeless People in an Urban Setting: Processes and Consequences of the Stigmatized Identity
title_full_unstemmed Self-Concepts of Homeless People in an Urban Setting: Processes and Consequences of the Stigmatized Identity
title_sort self-concepts of homeless people in an urban setting: processes and consequences of the stigmatized identity
publisher Digital Archive @ GSU
publishDate 2012
url http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/sociology_diss/65
http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=sociology_diss
work_keys_str_mv AT parkerjosiel selfconceptsofhomelesspeopleinanurbansettingprocessesandconsequencesofthestigmatizedidentity
_version_ 1716584619880480768