Manipulation and Hard Compatibilism
In this paper I consider a recent objection to compatibilism—the manipulation argument. This argument relies on two plausible principles: a manipulation principle that holds that manipulation precludes free will and moral responsibility, and a ‘no difference principle’ that holds that manipulation i...
Main Author: | Coates, Daniel Justin |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Digital Archive @ GSU
2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/28 http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=philosophy_theses |
Similar Items
-
Free Will and the Future of Humanity
by: Ruslan Myronenko
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Reflections on Sam Harris' "Free Will"
by: Daniel C. Dennett
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Responsibility and Manipulation
by: Cogley, Charles Zachary
Published: (2010) -
Physicalism and moral responsibility: presentation of derivative consequence argument
by: B. V. Faul
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Practical Perspective Compatibilism
by: Jeppsson, Sofia
Published: (2012)