Benchmark description of an advanced burner test reactor and verification of COMET for whole core criticality analysis in fast reactors

This work developed a stylized three dimensional benchmark problem based on Argonne National Laboratory's conceptual Advanced Burner Test Reactor design. This reactor is a sodium cooled fast reactor designed to burn recycled fuel to generate power while transmuting long term waste. The specif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ulmer, Richard Marion
Other Authors: Rahnema, Farzad
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Georgia Institute of Technology 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1853/52222
id ndltd-GATECH-oai-smartech.gatech.edu-1853-52222
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-GATECH-oai-smartech.gatech.edu-1853-522222014-11-20T03:34:29ZBenchmark description of an advanced burner test reactor and verification of COMET for whole core criticality analysis in fast reactorsUlmer, Richard MarionABTRHeterogeneous benchmarkHexagonal geometryWhole-core 3D benchmark problemCoarse meshThis work developed a stylized three dimensional benchmark problem based on Argonne National Laboratory's conceptual Advanced Burner Test Reactor design. This reactor is a sodium cooled fast reactor designed to burn recycled fuel to generate power while transmuting long term waste. The specification includes heterogeneity at both the assembly and core levels while the geometry and material compositions are both fully described. After developing the benchmark, 15 group cross sections were developed so that it could be used for transport code method verification. Using the aforementioned benchmark and 15 group cross sections, the Coarse-Mesh Transport Method (COMET) code was compared to Monte Carlo code MCNP5 (MCNP). Results were generated for three separate core cases: control rods out, near critical, and control rods in. The cross section groups developed do not compare favorably to the continuous energy model; however, the primary goal of these cross sections is to provide a common set of approachable cross sections that are widely usable for numerical methods development benchmarking. Eigenvalue comparison results for MCNP vs. COMET are strong, with two of the models within one standard deviation and the third model within one and a third standard deviation. The fission density results are highly accurate with a pin fission density average of less than 0.5% for each model.Georgia Institute of TechnologyRahnema, Farzad2014-08-27T13:36:56Z2014-08-27T13:36:56Z2014-082014-05-13August 20142014-08-27T13:36:56ZThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1853/52222en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic ABTR
Heterogeneous benchmark
Hexagonal geometry
Whole-core 3D benchmark problem
Coarse mesh
spellingShingle ABTR
Heterogeneous benchmark
Hexagonal geometry
Whole-core 3D benchmark problem
Coarse mesh
Ulmer, Richard Marion
Benchmark description of an advanced burner test reactor and verification of COMET for whole core criticality analysis in fast reactors
description This work developed a stylized three dimensional benchmark problem based on Argonne National Laboratory's conceptual Advanced Burner Test Reactor design. This reactor is a sodium cooled fast reactor designed to burn recycled fuel to generate power while transmuting long term waste. The specification includes heterogeneity at both the assembly and core levels while the geometry and material compositions are both fully described. After developing the benchmark, 15 group cross sections were developed so that it could be used for transport code method verification. Using the aforementioned benchmark and 15 group cross sections, the Coarse-Mesh Transport Method (COMET) code was compared to Monte Carlo code MCNP5 (MCNP). Results were generated for three separate core cases: control rods out, near critical, and control rods in. The cross section groups developed do not compare favorably to the continuous energy model; however, the primary goal of these cross sections is to provide a common set of approachable cross sections that are widely usable for numerical methods development benchmarking. Eigenvalue comparison results for MCNP vs. COMET are strong, with two of the models within one standard deviation and the third model within one and a third standard deviation. The fission density results are highly accurate with a pin fission density average of less than 0.5% for each model.
author2 Rahnema, Farzad
author_facet Rahnema, Farzad
Ulmer, Richard Marion
author Ulmer, Richard Marion
author_sort Ulmer, Richard Marion
title Benchmark description of an advanced burner test reactor and verification of COMET for whole core criticality analysis in fast reactors
title_short Benchmark description of an advanced burner test reactor and verification of COMET for whole core criticality analysis in fast reactors
title_full Benchmark description of an advanced burner test reactor and verification of COMET for whole core criticality analysis in fast reactors
title_fullStr Benchmark description of an advanced burner test reactor and verification of COMET for whole core criticality analysis in fast reactors
title_full_unstemmed Benchmark description of an advanced burner test reactor and verification of COMET for whole core criticality analysis in fast reactors
title_sort benchmark description of an advanced burner test reactor and verification of comet for whole core criticality analysis in fast reactors
publisher Georgia Institute of Technology
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/1853/52222
work_keys_str_mv AT ulmerrichardmarion benchmarkdescriptionofanadvancedburnertestreactorandverificationofcometforwholecorecriticalityanalysisinfastreactors
_version_ 1716719946856136704