Matching feedback with operator intent for efficient human-machine interface

Various roles for operators in human-machine systems have been proposed. This thesis shows that all of these views have in common the fact that operators perform best when given feedback that matches their intent. Past studies have shown that position control is superior to rate control except when...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elton, Mark David
Other Authors: Book, Wayne
Language:en_US
Published: Georgia Institute of Technology 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1853/50152
id ndltd-GATECH-oai-smartech.gatech.edu-1853-50152
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-GATECH-oai-smartech.gatech.edu-1853-501522014-11-26T03:33:53ZMatching feedback with operator intent for efficient human-machine interfaceElton, Mark DavidHuman-machine interfacePosition controlRate controlGhost interfaceHuman-machine systemsFeedback control systemsVarious roles for operators in human-machine systems have been proposed. This thesis shows that all of these views have in common the fact that operators perform best when given feedback that matches their intent. Past studies have shown that position control is superior to rate control except when operating large-workspace and/or dynamically slow manipulators and for exact tracking tasks. Operators of large-workspace and/or dynamically slow manipulators do not receive immediate position feedback. To remedy this lack of position feedback, a ghost arm overlay was displayed to operators of a dynamically slow manipulator, giving feedback that matches their intent. Operators performed several simple one- and two-dimensional tasks (point-to-point motion, tracking, path following) with three different controllers (position control with and without a ghost, rate control) to indicate how task conditions influence operator intent. Giving the operator position feedback via the ghost significantly increased performance with the position controller and made it comparable to performance with the rate control. These results were further validated by testing coordinated position control with and without a ghost arm and coordinated rate control on an excavator simulator. The results show that position control with the ghost arm is comparable, but not superior to rate control for the dynamics of our excavator example. Unlike previous work, this research compared the fuel efficiencies of different HMIs, as well as the time efficiencies. This work not only provides the design law of matching the feedback to the operator intent, but also gives a guideline for when to choose position or rate control based on the speed of the system.Georgia Institute of TechnologyBook, Wayne2014-01-10T19:36:42Z2014-01-10T19:36:42Z2012-11-09Dissertationhttp://hdl.handle.net/1853/50152en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Human-machine interface
Position control
Rate control
Ghost interface
Human-machine systems
Feedback control systems
spellingShingle Human-machine interface
Position control
Rate control
Ghost interface
Human-machine systems
Feedback control systems
Elton, Mark David
Matching feedback with operator intent for efficient human-machine interface
description Various roles for operators in human-machine systems have been proposed. This thesis shows that all of these views have in common the fact that operators perform best when given feedback that matches their intent. Past studies have shown that position control is superior to rate control except when operating large-workspace and/or dynamically slow manipulators and for exact tracking tasks. Operators of large-workspace and/or dynamically slow manipulators do not receive immediate position feedback. To remedy this lack of position feedback, a ghost arm overlay was displayed to operators of a dynamically slow manipulator, giving feedback that matches their intent. Operators performed several simple one- and two-dimensional tasks (point-to-point motion, tracking, path following) with three different controllers (position control with and without a ghost, rate control) to indicate how task conditions influence operator intent. Giving the operator position feedback via the ghost significantly increased performance with the position controller and made it comparable to performance with the rate control. These results were further validated by testing coordinated position control with and without a ghost arm and coordinated rate control on an excavator simulator. The results show that position control with the ghost arm is comparable, but not superior to rate control for the dynamics of our excavator example. Unlike previous work, this research compared the fuel efficiencies of different HMIs, as well as the time efficiencies. This work not only provides the design law of matching the feedback to the operator intent, but also gives a guideline for when to choose position or rate control based on the speed of the system.
author2 Book, Wayne
author_facet Book, Wayne
Elton, Mark David
author Elton, Mark David
author_sort Elton, Mark David
title Matching feedback with operator intent for efficient human-machine interface
title_short Matching feedback with operator intent for efficient human-machine interface
title_full Matching feedback with operator intent for efficient human-machine interface
title_fullStr Matching feedback with operator intent for efficient human-machine interface
title_full_unstemmed Matching feedback with operator intent for efficient human-machine interface
title_sort matching feedback with operator intent for efficient human-machine interface
publisher Georgia Institute of Technology
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/1853/50152
work_keys_str_mv AT eltonmarkdavid matchingfeedbackwithoperatorintentforefficienthumanmachineinterface
_version_ 1716720192004816896