Centrality and Private Regard as Key Factors Predicting Psychological Distress and Self-Esteem in Sexual Minorities

Sexual minority individuals (lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals) suffer from stigmatization, or minority stress, which often predicts negative mental health outcomes and low self-esteem. However, specific dimensions of identity (e.g., centrality and regard) may buffer against these negative outcomes i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fredrick, Emma G., Williams, Stacey L.
Published: Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/8072
id ndltd-ETSU-oai-dc.etsu.edu-etsu-works-9324
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-ETSU-oai-dc.etsu.edu-etsu-works-93242020-11-13T05:04:46Z Centrality and Private Regard as Key Factors Predicting Psychological Distress and Self-Esteem in Sexual Minorities Fredrick, Emma G. Williams, Stacey L. Sexual minority individuals (lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals) suffer from stigmatization, or minority stress, which often predicts negative mental health outcomes and low self-esteem. However, specific dimensions of identity (e.g., centrality and regard) may buffer against these negative outcomes in racial minorities and other stigmatized groups, including sexual minorities. Indeed, research in other stigmatized populations has found evidence for the protective properties of identity. Yet, limited research has examined dimensions of identity that buffer or protect sexual minorities. This study aimed to explore the moderating role of identity characteristics in the relation between sexual stigma and mental health outcomes. Findings in a sample of 209 gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals suggested that public stigma, centrality, and private regard predict psychological distress, but did not support a moderation model. Private regard emerged as a predictor of self-esteem as well. Additionally, centrality and public stigma interacted in such a way that those who reported higher centrality of sexual orientation identity did not report decrements to self-esteem in the face of public stigma to the same extent as those who reported lower centrality of sexual orientation identity. All of these suggest centrality and private regard as key factors in the psychological well-being of sexual minorities and should further be explored. 2015-04-09T07:00:00Z text https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/8072 ETSU Faculty Works Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University key factors psychological distress self esteem sexual minorities Psychology
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic key factors
psychological distress
self esteem
sexual minorities
Psychology
spellingShingle key factors
psychological distress
self esteem
sexual minorities
Psychology
Fredrick, Emma G.
Williams, Stacey L.
Centrality and Private Regard as Key Factors Predicting Psychological Distress and Self-Esteem in Sexual Minorities
description Sexual minority individuals (lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals) suffer from stigmatization, or minority stress, which often predicts negative mental health outcomes and low self-esteem. However, specific dimensions of identity (e.g., centrality and regard) may buffer against these negative outcomes in racial minorities and other stigmatized groups, including sexual minorities. Indeed, research in other stigmatized populations has found evidence for the protective properties of identity. Yet, limited research has examined dimensions of identity that buffer or protect sexual minorities. This study aimed to explore the moderating role of identity characteristics in the relation between sexual stigma and mental health outcomes. Findings in a sample of 209 gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals suggested that public stigma, centrality, and private regard predict psychological distress, but did not support a moderation model. Private regard emerged as a predictor of self-esteem as well. Additionally, centrality and public stigma interacted in such a way that those who reported higher centrality of sexual orientation identity did not report decrements to self-esteem in the face of public stigma to the same extent as those who reported lower centrality of sexual orientation identity. All of these suggest centrality and private regard as key factors in the psychological well-being of sexual minorities and should further be explored.
author Fredrick, Emma G.
Williams, Stacey L.
author_facet Fredrick, Emma G.
Williams, Stacey L.
author_sort Fredrick, Emma G.
title Centrality and Private Regard as Key Factors Predicting Psychological Distress and Self-Esteem in Sexual Minorities
title_short Centrality and Private Regard as Key Factors Predicting Psychological Distress and Self-Esteem in Sexual Minorities
title_full Centrality and Private Regard as Key Factors Predicting Psychological Distress and Self-Esteem in Sexual Minorities
title_fullStr Centrality and Private Regard as Key Factors Predicting Psychological Distress and Self-Esteem in Sexual Minorities
title_full_unstemmed Centrality and Private Regard as Key Factors Predicting Psychological Distress and Self-Esteem in Sexual Minorities
title_sort centrality and private regard as key factors predicting psychological distress and self-esteem in sexual minorities
publisher Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University
publishDate 2015
url https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/8072
work_keys_str_mv AT fredrickemmag centralityandprivateregardaskeyfactorspredictingpsychologicaldistressandselfesteeminsexualminorities
AT williamsstaceyl centralityandprivateregardaskeyfactorspredictingpsychologicaldistressandselfesteeminsexualminorities
_version_ 1719356208871112704