Old Enough to Know Better? Racial Biases, Perceived Age, and Young Defendants in Tennessee

A defendant’s age can be an important determinant of judicial outcomes, but the perception of a defendant’s age can have implications for how these outcomes are determined. Research has suggested a connection between racial bias and age perception. This study sought to describe an age bias against A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lasher, Michael P., Stinson, Jill D.
Published: Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/7962
id ndltd-ETSU-oai-dc.etsu.edu-etsu-works-9214
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-ETSU-oai-dc.etsu.edu-etsu-works-92142020-11-12T17:04:58Z Old Enough to Know Better? Racial Biases, Perceived Age, and Young Defendants in Tennessee Lasher, Michael P. Stinson, Jill D. A defendant’s age can be an important determinant of judicial outcomes, but the perception of a defendant’s age can have implications for how these outcomes are determined. Research has suggested a connection between racial bias and age perception. This study sought to describe an age bias against African-Americans, and to connect this to jury sentencing outcomes. Undergraduate participants (N = 318) were recruited from university in the Appalachia region. First, participants estimated the ages of individuals in photographs. Analyses primarily focused on 18 and 19-year-old African-American and Caucasian males, but included a number of photographs from older males and females. Then, participants suggested a prison sentence in a mock jury sentencing task. African-Americans were estimated to be older than Caucasians by nearly four years (d = 1.75). This difference was present when controlling for exposure to African Americans, but with a negligible effect (d = 0.17). A modest increase (0.5 years, d = 0.32) was found in the sentence lengths assigned to African-American defendants. Discrepancies between age estimates and Page 112 2015 Appalachian Student Research Forum sentence lengths were not correlated. However logistic regression analyses found that age estimates of African-Americans were predictive of sentences exceeding state guidelines for this group, and the difference in age estimates between African-Americans and Caucasians was predictive of excessive sentences for both groups. While these regressions produced statistically significant (p < 0.05), the effect sizes of these regressions were negligible (d < 0.20). These findings suggest age bias is present and may have implications for juveniles and young adults in criminal proceedings. 2015-04-09T07:00:00Z text https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/7962 ETSU Faculty Works Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University racial bias perceived age young defendants Tennessee Psychology
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic racial
bias
perceived age
young
defendants
Tennessee
Psychology
spellingShingle racial
bias
perceived age
young
defendants
Tennessee
Psychology
Lasher, Michael P.
Stinson, Jill D.
Old Enough to Know Better? Racial Biases, Perceived Age, and Young Defendants in Tennessee
description A defendant’s age can be an important determinant of judicial outcomes, but the perception of a defendant’s age can have implications for how these outcomes are determined. Research has suggested a connection between racial bias and age perception. This study sought to describe an age bias against African-Americans, and to connect this to jury sentencing outcomes. Undergraduate participants (N = 318) were recruited from university in the Appalachia region. First, participants estimated the ages of individuals in photographs. Analyses primarily focused on 18 and 19-year-old African-American and Caucasian males, but included a number of photographs from older males and females. Then, participants suggested a prison sentence in a mock jury sentencing task. African-Americans were estimated to be older than Caucasians by nearly four years (d = 1.75). This difference was present when controlling for exposure to African Americans, but with a negligible effect (d = 0.17). A modest increase (0.5 years, d = 0.32) was found in the sentence lengths assigned to African-American defendants. Discrepancies between age estimates and Page 112 2015 Appalachian Student Research Forum sentence lengths were not correlated. However logistic regression analyses found that age estimates of African-Americans were predictive of sentences exceeding state guidelines for this group, and the difference in age estimates between African-Americans and Caucasians was predictive of excessive sentences for both groups. While these regressions produced statistically significant (p < 0.05), the effect sizes of these regressions were negligible (d < 0.20). These findings suggest age bias is present and may have implications for juveniles and young adults in criminal proceedings.
author Lasher, Michael P.
Stinson, Jill D.
author_facet Lasher, Michael P.
Stinson, Jill D.
author_sort Lasher, Michael P.
title Old Enough to Know Better? Racial Biases, Perceived Age, and Young Defendants in Tennessee
title_short Old Enough to Know Better? Racial Biases, Perceived Age, and Young Defendants in Tennessee
title_full Old Enough to Know Better? Racial Biases, Perceived Age, and Young Defendants in Tennessee
title_fullStr Old Enough to Know Better? Racial Biases, Perceived Age, and Young Defendants in Tennessee
title_full_unstemmed Old Enough to Know Better? Racial Biases, Perceived Age, and Young Defendants in Tennessee
title_sort old enough to know better? racial biases, perceived age, and young defendants in tennessee
publisher Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University
publishDate 2015
url https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/7962
work_keys_str_mv AT lashermichaelp oldenoughtoknowbetterracialbiasesperceivedageandyoungdefendantsintennessee
AT stinsonjilld oldenoughtoknowbetterracialbiasesperceivedageandyoungdefendantsintennessee
_version_ 1719356170597040128