Intimate Partner Violence Screening Tools: Validation for Rural Pregnant Women

Intimate Partner Violence Screening Tools: Validation for Rural Pregnant Women

This attempt to validate the brief AAS and WAST against the gold-standard CTS2 resulted in sensitivities of 34.8% (AAS) and 45.5% (WAST) for physical IPV; however both identified a much smaller number of cases of sexual violence than the CTS2 in a rural pregnant population.

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fletcher, Tifani A., Clements, Andrea D., McGrady, Lana, Bailey, Beth A.
Published: Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University 2013
Subjects:
intimate partner violence
pregnancy
Psychology
Family Medicine
Community-Based Research
Health Psychology
Substance Abuse and Addiction
Online Access:https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/7259
Description
Summary:This attempt to validate the brief AAS and WAST against the gold-standard CTS2 resulted in sensitivities of 34.8% (AAS) and 45.5% (WAST) for physical IPV; however both identified a much smaller number of cases of sexual violence than the CTS2 in a rural pregnant population.

Similar Items