Successful Factors for Native and Community College Transfer Students in Engineering Technology at a Four-Year University

Students who attend community colleges often transfer to 4-year universities seeking to earn a degree typically not offered at the community college level. Tennessee has 2 programs: the Tennessee Promise and the Tennessee Reconnect programs that offer students tuition-free access to the state’s comm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Craig, Leendert
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3532
https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4992&context=etd
id ndltd-ETSU-oai-dc.etsu.edu-etd-4992
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-ETSU-oai-dc.etsu.edu-etd-49922019-05-16T05:20:09Z Successful Factors for Native and Community College Transfer Students in Engineering Technology at a Four-Year University Craig, Leendert Students who attend community colleges often transfer to 4-year universities seeking to earn a degree typically not offered at the community college level. Tennessee has 2 programs: the Tennessee Promise and the Tennessee Reconnect programs that offer students tuition-free access to the state’s community college system. Previous studies have been conducted to compare transfer students’ performances to that of native students and typically compared the students in all disciplines. This study seeks to compare transfer students (students who enter the participating university with 40 or more credit hours) to native students (students who initially enrolled or transferred into the 4-year participating university with fewer than 40 credit hours) the engineering technology major (ENTC) to determine if transfer students are doing as well as or better than native students. The present study used archival data from student records from fall 2008 through fall 2017. The data were provided by Institutional Research at the participating university. The dataset included 416 transfer students and 900 native students. Students were classified as transfer or native based on study criteria. They were then divided into subgroups by gender, Pell grant recipient status, first-generation status, 3000 and 4000 level GPA, high-school GPA, ACT composite scores, age, and whether the student graduated or not. The data were analyzed quantitatively seeking to find differences between the native and transfer students’ graduation rates and differences in the subgroups. The 3000 and 4000 level coursework GPA were examined for transfer shock. There were significant differences between transfer and native students in graduation rates, percent who were first-generation, Pell grant recipient status, and age. Overall, graduation rates for transfer students were 38.8% and 21.8% for native students. The findings indicated that 48.8% of female transfer students persisted to graduation compared to 17.3% of native female students. Male transfer students and male native students graduated at a rate of 43.1% and 22.0%, respectively. There were no significant differences in 3000 and 4000 course level GPA, high-school GPA, or ACT composite scores between the two groups. 2019-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3532 https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4992&context=etd Copyright by the authors. Electronic Theses and Dissertations eng Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University engineering technology community college transfer student community college transfer student native student successful vertical transfer Engineering Education
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic engineering technology
community college
transfer student
community college transfer student
native student
successful vertical transfer
Engineering Education
spellingShingle engineering technology
community college
transfer student
community college transfer student
native student
successful vertical transfer
Engineering Education
Craig, Leendert
Successful Factors for Native and Community College Transfer Students in Engineering Technology at a Four-Year University
description Students who attend community colleges often transfer to 4-year universities seeking to earn a degree typically not offered at the community college level. Tennessee has 2 programs: the Tennessee Promise and the Tennessee Reconnect programs that offer students tuition-free access to the state’s community college system. Previous studies have been conducted to compare transfer students’ performances to that of native students and typically compared the students in all disciplines. This study seeks to compare transfer students (students who enter the participating university with 40 or more credit hours) to native students (students who initially enrolled or transferred into the 4-year participating university with fewer than 40 credit hours) the engineering technology major (ENTC) to determine if transfer students are doing as well as or better than native students. The present study used archival data from student records from fall 2008 through fall 2017. The data were provided by Institutional Research at the participating university. The dataset included 416 transfer students and 900 native students. Students were classified as transfer or native based on study criteria. They were then divided into subgroups by gender, Pell grant recipient status, first-generation status, 3000 and 4000 level GPA, high-school GPA, ACT composite scores, age, and whether the student graduated or not. The data were analyzed quantitatively seeking to find differences between the native and transfer students’ graduation rates and differences in the subgroups. The 3000 and 4000 level coursework GPA were examined for transfer shock. There were significant differences between transfer and native students in graduation rates, percent who were first-generation, Pell grant recipient status, and age. Overall, graduation rates for transfer students were 38.8% and 21.8% for native students. The findings indicated that 48.8% of female transfer students persisted to graduation compared to 17.3% of native female students. Male transfer students and male native students graduated at a rate of 43.1% and 22.0%, respectively. There were no significant differences in 3000 and 4000 course level GPA, high-school GPA, or ACT composite scores between the two groups.
author Craig, Leendert
author_facet Craig, Leendert
author_sort Craig, Leendert
title Successful Factors for Native and Community College Transfer Students in Engineering Technology at a Four-Year University
title_short Successful Factors for Native and Community College Transfer Students in Engineering Technology at a Four-Year University
title_full Successful Factors for Native and Community College Transfer Students in Engineering Technology at a Four-Year University
title_fullStr Successful Factors for Native and Community College Transfer Students in Engineering Technology at a Four-Year University
title_full_unstemmed Successful Factors for Native and Community College Transfer Students in Engineering Technology at a Four-Year University
title_sort successful factors for native and community college transfer students in engineering technology at a four-year university
publisher Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University
publishDate 2019
url https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3532
https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4992&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT craigleendert successfulfactorsfornativeandcommunitycollegetransferstudentsinengineeringtechnologyatafouryearuniversity
_version_ 1719189965324156928