Big Game Cats and Defining Football’s Value: College Football’s Popularity, Controversies, and Expansion
This thesis directly approaches intercollegiate football from a cultural perspective. The football’s popularity exploded during the Twentieth-Century. Television, merchandizing, and a national sporting culture are associated with this development. However, controversies often muddied the waters of t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2521 https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3905&context=etd |
id |
ndltd-ETSU-oai-dc.etsu.edu-etd-3905 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-ETSU-oai-dc.etsu.edu-etd-39052019-05-16T04:50:32Z Big Game Cats and Defining Football’s Value: College Football’s Popularity, Controversies, and Expansion Himel, Matthew T This thesis directly approaches intercollegiate football from a cultural perspective. The football’s popularity exploded during the Twentieth-Century. Television, merchandizing, and a national sporting culture are associated with this development. However, controversies often muddied the waters of that popularity. Football’s brutality, athletic scholarships, and controversies within athletics departments overshadowed the immense popularity of intercollegiate football. During the Twenty-First Century, several universities started new football programs. Two of which being Georgia State University and Southeastern Louisiana University. Given the context balancing popularity and controversy, the administrators demonstrated how the image of intercollegiate football has changed over the course of the past century. This thesis analyzes how the administrators sold the new football programs to their respective institutions and concludes that both universities emphasized the sport’s popularity, avoided controversy, recognized the large potential for financial loss, and concentrated the new programs benefit being increased indirect and intrinsic values. 2015-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2521 https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3905&context=etd Copyright by the authors. Electronic Theses and Dissertations eng Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Intercollegiate Football NCAA Athletics Division I FCS Georgia State Athletics Southeastern Louisiana Athletics Sporting Culture American Popular Culture Other American Studies |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Intercollegiate Football NCAA Athletics Division I FCS Georgia State Athletics Southeastern Louisiana Athletics Sporting Culture American Popular Culture Other American Studies |
spellingShingle |
Intercollegiate Football NCAA Athletics Division I FCS Georgia State Athletics Southeastern Louisiana Athletics Sporting Culture American Popular Culture Other American Studies Himel, Matthew T Big Game Cats and Defining Football’s Value: College Football’s Popularity, Controversies, and Expansion |
description |
This thesis directly approaches intercollegiate football from a cultural perspective. The football’s popularity exploded during the Twentieth-Century. Television, merchandizing, and a national sporting culture are associated with this development. However, controversies often muddied the waters of that popularity. Football’s brutality, athletic scholarships, and controversies within athletics departments overshadowed the immense popularity of intercollegiate football. During the Twenty-First Century, several universities started new football programs. Two of which being Georgia State University and Southeastern Louisiana University. Given the context balancing popularity and controversy, the administrators demonstrated how the image of intercollegiate football has changed over the course of the past century. This thesis analyzes how the administrators sold the new football programs to their respective institutions and concludes that both universities emphasized the sport’s popularity, avoided controversy, recognized the large potential for financial loss, and concentrated the new programs benefit being increased indirect and intrinsic values. |
author |
Himel, Matthew T |
author_facet |
Himel, Matthew T |
author_sort |
Himel, Matthew T |
title |
Big Game Cats and Defining Football’s Value: College Football’s Popularity, Controversies, and Expansion |
title_short |
Big Game Cats and Defining Football’s Value: College Football’s Popularity, Controversies, and Expansion |
title_full |
Big Game Cats and Defining Football’s Value: College Football’s Popularity, Controversies, and Expansion |
title_fullStr |
Big Game Cats and Defining Football’s Value: College Football’s Popularity, Controversies, and Expansion |
title_full_unstemmed |
Big Game Cats and Defining Football’s Value: College Football’s Popularity, Controversies, and Expansion |
title_sort |
big game cats and defining football’s value: college football’s popularity, controversies, and expansion |
publisher |
Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2521 https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3905&context=etd |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT himelmatthewt biggamecatsanddefiningfootballsvaluecollegefootballspopularitycontroversiesandexpansion |
_version_ |
1719188437595062272 |