Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism

Geller’s Actively Caring Survey (ACS) was theorized to measure person states deemed necessary to “Actively Care” or act altruistically toward others. Empirical research of the ACS has been limited, and this researcher sought to evaluate its reliability, validity, and factorial consistency. Undergrad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Randall, Philip
Format: Others
Published: Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2275
https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3381&context=etd
id ndltd-ETSU-oai-dc.etsu.edu-etd-3381
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-ETSU-oai-dc.etsu.edu-etd-33812019-05-16T04:42:37Z Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism Randall, Philip Geller’s Actively Caring Survey (ACS) was theorized to measure person states deemed necessary to “Actively Care” or act altruistically toward others. Empirical research of the ACS has been limited, and this researcher sought to evaluate its reliability, validity, and factorial consistency. Undergraduate students (n = 1,095) completed the measure online. Hypotheses were partially supported. Unrotated primary component analysis found the ACS to be a unitary measure with 73.3% of the items loading onto the first factor. The ACS showed excellent internal consistency. Convergent and divergent validity with existing measures (i.e., the Big 5 Personality, Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability, Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, Barratt Impulsiveness, and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Venturesomeness scales) was found in 88.9% of the predicted relationships; the ACS was negatively correlated with social desirability. An abbreviated ACS revision produced similar findings. Future studies should evaluate the measure in nonstudent populations, use clinical and industrial settings, and explore predictive validity. 2013-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2275 https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3381&context=etd Copyright by the authors. Electronic Theses and Dissertations Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Actively Caring Survey Factor analysis Altruism Prosocial Component analysis Big Five Social Desirability Cognitive Failures Impulsiveness Personality Applied Behavior Analysis Clinical Psychology Community Psychology Industrial and Organizational Psychology Social Psychology
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Actively Caring Survey
Factor analysis
Altruism
Prosocial
Component analysis
Big Five
Social Desirability
Cognitive Failures
Impulsiveness
Personality
Applied Behavior Analysis
Clinical Psychology
Community Psychology
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Social Psychology
spellingShingle Actively Caring Survey
Factor analysis
Altruism
Prosocial
Component analysis
Big Five
Social Desirability
Cognitive Failures
Impulsiveness
Personality
Applied Behavior Analysis
Clinical Psychology
Community Psychology
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Social Psychology
Randall, Philip
Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism
description Geller’s Actively Caring Survey (ACS) was theorized to measure person states deemed necessary to “Actively Care” or act altruistically toward others. Empirical research of the ACS has been limited, and this researcher sought to evaluate its reliability, validity, and factorial consistency. Undergraduate students (n = 1,095) completed the measure online. Hypotheses were partially supported. Unrotated primary component analysis found the ACS to be a unitary measure with 73.3% of the items loading onto the first factor. The ACS showed excellent internal consistency. Convergent and divergent validity with existing measures (i.e., the Big 5 Personality, Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability, Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, Barratt Impulsiveness, and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Venturesomeness scales) was found in 88.9% of the predicted relationships; the ACS was negatively correlated with social desirability. An abbreviated ACS revision produced similar findings. Future studies should evaluate the measure in nonstudent populations, use clinical and industrial settings, and explore predictive validity.
author Randall, Philip
author_facet Randall, Philip
author_sort Randall, Philip
title Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism
title_short Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism
title_full Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism
title_fullStr Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism
title_full_unstemmed Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism
title_sort actively caring about the actively caring survey: evaluating the reliability and validity of a measure of dispositional altruism
publisher Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University
publishDate 2013
url https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2275
https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3381&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT randallphilip activelycaringabouttheactivelycaringsurveyevaluatingthereliabilityandvalidityofameasureofdispositionalaltruism
_version_ 1719188164059332608