Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism
Geller’s Actively Caring Survey (ACS) was theorized to measure person states deemed necessary to “Actively Care” or act altruistically toward others. Empirical research of the ACS has been limited, and this researcher sought to evaluate its reliability, validity, and factorial consistency. Undergrad...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2275 https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3381&context=etd |
id |
ndltd-ETSU-oai-dc.etsu.edu-etd-3381 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-ETSU-oai-dc.etsu.edu-etd-33812019-05-16T04:42:37Z Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism Randall, Philip Geller’s Actively Caring Survey (ACS) was theorized to measure person states deemed necessary to “Actively Care” or act altruistically toward others. Empirical research of the ACS has been limited, and this researcher sought to evaluate its reliability, validity, and factorial consistency. Undergraduate students (n = 1,095) completed the measure online. Hypotheses were partially supported. Unrotated primary component analysis found the ACS to be a unitary measure with 73.3% of the items loading onto the first factor. The ACS showed excellent internal consistency. Convergent and divergent validity with existing measures (i.e., the Big 5 Personality, Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability, Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, Barratt Impulsiveness, and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Venturesomeness scales) was found in 88.9% of the predicted relationships; the ACS was negatively correlated with social desirability. An abbreviated ACS revision produced similar findings. Future studies should evaluate the measure in nonstudent populations, use clinical and industrial settings, and explore predictive validity. 2013-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2275 https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3381&context=etd Copyright by the authors. Electronic Theses and Dissertations Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Actively Caring Survey Factor analysis Altruism Prosocial Component analysis Big Five Social Desirability Cognitive Failures Impulsiveness Personality Applied Behavior Analysis Clinical Psychology Community Psychology Industrial and Organizational Psychology Social Psychology |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Actively Caring Survey Factor analysis Altruism Prosocial Component analysis Big Five Social Desirability Cognitive Failures Impulsiveness Personality Applied Behavior Analysis Clinical Psychology Community Psychology Industrial and Organizational Psychology Social Psychology |
spellingShingle |
Actively Caring Survey Factor analysis Altruism Prosocial Component analysis Big Five Social Desirability Cognitive Failures Impulsiveness Personality Applied Behavior Analysis Clinical Psychology Community Psychology Industrial and Organizational Psychology Social Psychology Randall, Philip Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism |
description |
Geller’s Actively Caring Survey (ACS) was theorized to measure person states deemed necessary to “Actively Care” or act altruistically toward others. Empirical research of the ACS has been limited, and this researcher sought to evaluate its reliability, validity, and factorial consistency. Undergraduate students (n = 1,095) completed the measure online. Hypotheses were partially supported. Unrotated primary component analysis found the ACS to be a unitary measure with 73.3% of the items loading onto the first factor. The ACS showed excellent internal consistency. Convergent and divergent validity with existing measures (i.e., the Big 5 Personality, Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability, Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, Barratt Impulsiveness, and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Venturesomeness scales) was found in 88.9% of the predicted relationships; the ACS was negatively correlated with social desirability. An abbreviated ACS revision produced similar findings. Future studies should evaluate the measure in nonstudent populations, use clinical and industrial settings, and explore predictive validity. |
author |
Randall, Philip |
author_facet |
Randall, Philip |
author_sort |
Randall, Philip |
title |
Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism |
title_short |
Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism |
title_full |
Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism |
title_fullStr |
Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Actively Caring About the Actively Caring Survey: Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Dispositional Altruism |
title_sort |
actively caring about the actively caring survey: evaluating the reliability and validity of a measure of dispositional altruism |
publisher |
Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2275 https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3381&context=etd |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT randallphilip activelycaringabouttheactivelycaringsurveyevaluatingthereliabilityandvalidityofameasureofdispositionalaltruism |
_version_ |
1719188164059332608 |