Organizational Strategies of Influence on American Environmental Policy, 1976-2006: A Network Exploration of Power Elitism versus Pluralism
This thesis examines two organizational strategies employed for influencing American environmental policy with considerations to the "power elite" and "pluralist" models of policy control. Using a data set comprised of 379 organizations derived from US congressional hearings on c...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1437 https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2630&context=etd |
id |
ndltd-ETSU-oai-dc.etsu.edu-etd-2630 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-ETSU-oai-dc.etsu.edu-etd-26302019-05-16T04:44:13Z Organizational Strategies of Influence on American Environmental Policy, 1976-2006: A Network Exploration of Power Elitism versus Pluralism Michel, Shaun Lucien This thesis examines two organizational strategies employed for influencing American environmental policy with considerations to the "power elite" and "pluralist" models of policy control. Using a data set comprised of 379 organizations derived from US congressional hearings on climate change policy between 1976 and 2006, I find that industrial corporations conceal the public footprint of their involvement by financially encouraging "independent" research centers to provide favorable testimony. Meanwhile, nonprofit organizations are more likely to be co-represented by shared experts, a resource that is strategically shared for political gain. These findings provide some circumscribed support for both the power elite and pluralist models of organizational influence: the organization of power elites has a disproportionate amount of resources in a system that provides an arena for competing values and goals. Implications for understanding the organizational strategies towards congressional testimony as well as directions for future research are discussed based on these findings. 2012-05-05T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1437 https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2630&context=etd Copyright by the authors. Electronic Theses and Dissertations Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Pluralism Climate Change Policy Organizational Strategy Congressional Hearings Power Elite Social Network Analysis Politics and Social Change Social and Behavioral Sciences Sociology |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Pluralism Climate Change Policy Organizational Strategy Congressional Hearings Power Elite Social Network Analysis Politics and Social Change Social and Behavioral Sciences Sociology |
spellingShingle |
Pluralism Climate Change Policy Organizational Strategy Congressional Hearings Power Elite Social Network Analysis Politics and Social Change Social and Behavioral Sciences Sociology Michel, Shaun Lucien Organizational Strategies of Influence on American Environmental Policy, 1976-2006: A Network Exploration of Power Elitism versus Pluralism |
description |
This thesis examines two organizational strategies employed for influencing American environmental policy with considerations to the "power elite" and "pluralist" models of policy control. Using a data set comprised of 379 organizations derived from US congressional hearings on climate change policy between 1976 and 2006, I find that industrial corporations conceal the public footprint of their involvement by financially encouraging "independent" research centers to provide favorable testimony. Meanwhile, nonprofit organizations are more likely to be co-represented by shared experts, a resource that is strategically shared for political gain. These findings provide some circumscribed support for both the power elite and pluralist models of organizational influence: the organization of power elites has a disproportionate amount of resources in a system that provides an arena for competing values and goals. Implications for understanding the organizational strategies towards congressional testimony as well as directions for future research are discussed based on these findings. |
author |
Michel, Shaun Lucien |
author_facet |
Michel, Shaun Lucien |
author_sort |
Michel, Shaun Lucien |
title |
Organizational Strategies of Influence on American Environmental Policy, 1976-2006: A Network Exploration of Power Elitism versus Pluralism |
title_short |
Organizational Strategies of Influence on American Environmental Policy, 1976-2006: A Network Exploration of Power Elitism versus Pluralism |
title_full |
Organizational Strategies of Influence on American Environmental Policy, 1976-2006: A Network Exploration of Power Elitism versus Pluralism |
title_fullStr |
Organizational Strategies of Influence on American Environmental Policy, 1976-2006: A Network Exploration of Power Elitism versus Pluralism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Organizational Strategies of Influence on American Environmental Policy, 1976-2006: A Network Exploration of Power Elitism versus Pluralism |
title_sort |
organizational strategies of influence on american environmental policy, 1976-2006: a network exploration of power elitism versus pluralism |
publisher |
Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1437 https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2630&context=etd |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michelshaunlucien organizationalstrategiesofinfluenceonamericanenvironmentalpolicy19762006anetworkexplorationofpowerelitismversuspluralism |
_version_ |
1719188053548859392 |