Institutional Reflexivity

How can we understand the innovativeness of firms or organizations in general, and how should we assess it in terms of nontechnological innovation? My paper deals with these two questions. The “ability” of companies to adapt to new circumstances, to create new products, processes and new knowledge,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moldaschl, Manfred F.
Other Authors: TU Chemnitz, Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Universitätsbibliothek Chemnitz 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-200701809
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-200701809
http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/5492/data/WP_2007_02_Moldaschl.pdf
http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/5492/20070180.txt
id ndltd-DRESDEN-oai-qucosa.de-bsz-ch1-200701809
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-DRESDEN-oai-qucosa.de-bsz-ch1-2007018092013-01-07T19:57:17Z Institutional Reflexivity Moldaschl, Manfred F. Institutional Reflexivity Absorptive Capacity Competence-Based View Dynamic Capabilities ddc:330 Innovationsbereitschaft Innovationspotenzial How can we understand the innovativeness of firms or organizations in general, and how should we assess it in terms of nontechnological innovation? My paper deals with these two questions. The “ability” of companies to adapt to new circumstances, to create new products, processes and new knowledge, has been conceptualized in many approaches. Some of them simply define a list of “(critical) success factors” or “(key) performance indica-tors”, as tools for ranking and evaluation, without any theoretical reference. Others, like the resource-based or capability-based approach(es), work with theoretical references, but are still very weak in operationalizing of what they call “capability”. My paper gives a critical description of this situation and offers a new proposal to classify and to measure the “inclination” of organizations to innovate in all dimensions. This proposal roots in pragmatistic thinking as represented in the theory of reflexive modernization and in the pragmatist version of organizational learning theory. Empirically, it has been applied merely in case studies yet. A survey project is in preparation. Universitätsbibliothek Chemnitz TU Chemnitz, Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften 2007-11-19 doc-type:preprint application/pdf text/plain application/zip http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-200701809 urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-200701809 http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/5492/data/WP_2007_02_Moldaschl.pdf http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/5492/20070180.txt eng
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Institutional Reflexivity
Absorptive Capacity
Competence-Based View
Dynamic Capabilities
ddc:330
Innovationsbereitschaft
Innovationspotenzial
spellingShingle Institutional Reflexivity
Absorptive Capacity
Competence-Based View
Dynamic Capabilities
ddc:330
Innovationsbereitschaft
Innovationspotenzial
Moldaschl, Manfred F.
Institutional Reflexivity
description How can we understand the innovativeness of firms or organizations in general, and how should we assess it in terms of nontechnological innovation? My paper deals with these two questions. The “ability” of companies to adapt to new circumstances, to create new products, processes and new knowledge, has been conceptualized in many approaches. Some of them simply define a list of “(critical) success factors” or “(key) performance indica-tors”, as tools for ranking and evaluation, without any theoretical reference. Others, like the resource-based or capability-based approach(es), work with theoretical references, but are still very weak in operationalizing of what they call “capability”. My paper gives a critical description of this situation and offers a new proposal to classify and to measure the “inclination” of organizations to innovate in all dimensions. This proposal roots in pragmatistic thinking as represented in the theory of reflexive modernization and in the pragmatist version of organizational learning theory. Empirically, it has been applied merely in case studies yet. A survey project is in preparation.
author2 TU Chemnitz, Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften
author_facet TU Chemnitz, Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Moldaschl, Manfred F.
author Moldaschl, Manfred F.
author_sort Moldaschl, Manfred F.
title Institutional Reflexivity
title_short Institutional Reflexivity
title_full Institutional Reflexivity
title_fullStr Institutional Reflexivity
title_full_unstemmed Institutional Reflexivity
title_sort institutional reflexivity
publisher Universitätsbibliothek Chemnitz
publishDate 2007
url http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-200701809
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-200701809
http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/5492/data/WP_2007_02_Moldaschl.pdf
http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/5492/20070180.txt
work_keys_str_mv AT moldaschlmanfredf institutionalreflexivity
_version_ 1716471954084462592