A Discussion of different teaching strategies adopted during a Statistics tutorial

In this discusses four different approaches used during a statistics tutorial of a group of first year undergraduates studying computer science related degrees at the University of Westminster UK. The four approaches were each implemented in an attempt to keep the students interested in the statisti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pavlika, Vasos
Other Authors: HTW Dresden, Informatik, Mathematik
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Saechsische Landesbibliothek- Staats- und Universitaetsbibliothek Dresden 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-88200
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-88200
http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/8820/Proceedings-636pages-Dresden2009_477-480.pdf
id ndltd-DRESDEN-oai-qucosa.de-bsz-14-qucosa-88200
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-DRESDEN-oai-qucosa.de-bsz-14-qucosa-882002013-01-07T20:04:57Z A Discussion of different teaching strategies adopted during a Statistics tutorial Pavlika, Vasos Statistikübung Lehrstrategien Klassenquiz Normalverteilung Stochastikunterricht Klassenraumstrategien statistics tutorial teaching strategies class quiz normal distribution stochastics lessons classroom management ddc:510 rvk:SD 2009 In this discusses four different approaches used during a statistics tutorial of a group of first year undergraduates studying computer science related degrees at the University of Westminster UK. The four approaches were each implemented in an attempt to keep the students interested in the statistics topics delivered. It was found that “Chalk and Talk” (i.e. board work) was not the best form of imparting knowledge to the students of the group as determined by student analysing feedback forms and generally observing student behaviour and listening to student comments over a number of years delivering statistics topics. The duration of each tutorial was two hours. The teaching strategies adopted were: a) A class quiz. b) Group explanation of material to members of the individual’s group. c) Group explanation of material to members of the entire class. d) Students teaching at the front of the class. Each of the methods will now be discussed with the relative merits and defects included for a comparison. It was found that each method worked better at the end of each module when the students were more familiar with the topics introduced on the module. Saechsische Landesbibliothek- Staats- und Universitaetsbibliothek Dresden HTW Dresden, Informatik, Mathematik 2012-05-31 doc-type:conferenceObject application/pdf http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-88200 urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-88200 PPN371800811 http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/8820/Proceedings-636pages-Dresden2009_477-480.pdf Proceedings of the tenth International Conference Models in Developing Mathematics Education. - Dresden : Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft, 2009. - S. 477 - 480 eng
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Statistikübung
Lehrstrategien
Klassenquiz
Normalverteilung
Stochastikunterricht
Klassenraumstrategien
statistics tutorial
teaching strategies
class quiz
normal distribution
stochastics lessons
classroom management
ddc:510
rvk:SD 2009
spellingShingle Statistikübung
Lehrstrategien
Klassenquiz
Normalverteilung
Stochastikunterricht
Klassenraumstrategien
statistics tutorial
teaching strategies
class quiz
normal distribution
stochastics lessons
classroom management
ddc:510
rvk:SD 2009
Pavlika, Vasos
A Discussion of different teaching strategies adopted during a Statistics tutorial
description In this discusses four different approaches used during a statistics tutorial of a group of first year undergraduates studying computer science related degrees at the University of Westminster UK. The four approaches were each implemented in an attempt to keep the students interested in the statistics topics delivered. It was found that “Chalk and Talk” (i.e. board work) was not the best form of imparting knowledge to the students of the group as determined by student analysing feedback forms and generally observing student behaviour and listening to student comments over a number of years delivering statistics topics. The duration of each tutorial was two hours. The teaching strategies adopted were: a) A class quiz. b) Group explanation of material to members of the individual’s group. c) Group explanation of material to members of the entire class. d) Students teaching at the front of the class. Each of the methods will now be discussed with the relative merits and defects included for a comparison. It was found that each method worked better at the end of each module when the students were more familiar with the topics introduced on the module.
author2 HTW Dresden, Informatik, Mathematik
author_facet HTW Dresden, Informatik, Mathematik
Pavlika, Vasos
author Pavlika, Vasos
author_sort Pavlika, Vasos
title A Discussion of different teaching strategies adopted during a Statistics tutorial
title_short A Discussion of different teaching strategies adopted during a Statistics tutorial
title_full A Discussion of different teaching strategies adopted during a Statistics tutorial
title_fullStr A Discussion of different teaching strategies adopted during a Statistics tutorial
title_full_unstemmed A Discussion of different teaching strategies adopted during a Statistics tutorial
title_sort discussion of different teaching strategies adopted during a statistics tutorial
publisher Saechsische Landesbibliothek- Staats- und Universitaetsbibliothek Dresden
publishDate 2012
url http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-88200
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-88200
http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/8820/Proceedings-636pages-Dresden2009_477-480.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pavlikavasos adiscussionofdifferentteachingstrategiesadoptedduringastatisticstutorial
AT pavlikavasos discussionofdifferentteachingstrategiesadoptedduringastatisticstutorial
_version_ 1716472974831255552